Skip to main content

What about beta?

In the new, soon-to-be released version of the TradeRadar software I will be more than quadrupling the number of fundamental indicators that will be evaluated for every stock. One of the indicators is beta.

In my research to determine how to evaluate beta in the program, I realized I needed a refresher course on what beta means for an investor. The following is the result of my investigation.

Definition --

The beta (β) of a stock or portfolio is a number describing the relation of its returns with that of the financial market as a whole.

It tells you how fluctuations in the return of a stock co-vary with an index, often the S&P 500.

An asset with a beta of 0 means that its price is not at all correlated with the market. A positive beta means that the asset generally follows the market. A negative beta shows that the asset inversely follows the market; the asset generally decreases in value if the market goes up and vice versa.

Another way of distinguishing between beta and correlation is to think about direction and magnitude. If the market is always up 10% and a stock is always up 20%, the correlation is one (correlation measures direction, not magnitude). However, beta takes into account both direction and magnitude, so in the same example the beta would be 2 (the stock is up twice as much as the market).

Beta has no upper or lower bound, and betas as large as 3 or 4 will occur with highly volatile stocks.

Beta can be quite important, but it is often completely misused. It is often referred to as a measure of risk. If you want to know how risky an investment is, look at the volatility directly.

Examples --

Consumer Staples stocks are thought to be less affected by cycles and usually have lower beta (often between 0 and 1). Procter & Gamble, which makes soap, is a classic example. Other similar ones are Philip Morris and Johnson & Johnson. Utility stocks are thought to be less cyclical and have lower beta as well, for similar reasons.

Tech stocks typically have higher beta. An extreme example for the tech sector is the dot-com bubble. Tech outperformed everything in sight in the late 1990s but it also cratered in the early 2000s, worse than the overall market.

Many precious metals and precious-metal-related stocks are beta-negative as their value tends to increase when the general market is down and vice versa.

Beta can be zero. Some zero-beta assets are risk-free, such as cash. Some used to consider Treasury bonds to be zero-beta, risk free assets though during the dark days of 2008 and early 2009, one could make the argument that treasury bonds had a negative beta as investors fled the stock market and bought Treasury bonds for their perceived safety. Which goes to show you that beta can change drastically depending on market conditions.

Using beta to match your tolerance for risk --

Many people are extremely reluctant to take losses and therefore opt for investments with low volatility. Other people are willing to take on additional risk because with it they receive the possibility of increased reward. Which one are you?

It is very important that investors not only have a good understanding of their risk tolerance, but also know which investments match their risk preferences. Beta can help.

By using beta to measure volatility, you can better choose those securities that meet your criteria for risk. Investors who are very risk averse should put their money into investments with low betas such as utility stocks and Treasury bills. Those investors who are willing to take on more risk may want to invest in stocks with higher betas.

Beta can also be used in portfolio management to adjust the risk profile of the overall portfolio. For an investor who has a "somewhat" risk-averse attitude, a high percentage of the portfolio could be allocated to low beta securities and a small percentage could be used to chase superior returns via high beta stocks that are more prone to volatile market movements.

Calculating beta --

As described above, beta is defined as the relative volatility of a stock’s returns compared to those of the market. We can use a simple line to represent this relationship. You might remember from your high school geometry that the formula for a straight line is y = a + bx. In this case, we replace the b with the Greek beta.

We use a stock’s returns as the dependent variable or Y and the returns from the S&P 500 as the independent variable or X. The steeper the line, the higher the beta. See the chart below.

The beta we calculate is historical, though we often use it to estimate the required return for the stock into the future. Since the calculation of beta uses past prices, there is a limit to how useful it is to project beta too far into the future. You know that phrase that every mutual fund advertisement uses: "Past returns are no guarantee of future returns". Beta is subject to the same kind of caveat.

Conclusion --

From the point of view of determining whether a stock's beta is acceptable, there are a several things to look at.
  • Is the stock's beta consistent with the industry sector? A utility stock with a high beta has something going on and investors should be cautious. Likewise, a tech stock with a low beta implies its high-growth period may be behind it.
  • Is the stock's beta consistent with an investor's risk tolerance? For investors who fear volatility, a high beta investment requires that the investor make a very careful evaluation of the stock in order to be comfortable holding that stock. Or the investor may want to reject the stock altogether as a potential investment.
  • An investor's time horizon is important. Investors need to make a distinction between short-term risk -- where beta and price volatility are useful -- and longer-term, fundamental risk, where big-picture risk factors are more telling. High betas may mean price volatility over the near term, but they don't always rule out long-term opportunities.
Taking these factors into consideration can make it easier for an investor to assess the beta of a potential investment. Needless to say, beta should never be the only criteria used to gauge the suitability of an investment but it can be an important consideration.

I hope this post makes it easier for you to use beta in your own investing.


Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Thursday Bounce: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Trend Leaders for July 9, 2009

This is a quick post to announce that we have published Thursday's Trend Leaders, Swing Signals and Trend Busters at Alert HQ . All are based on daily data. Today we have the following: 72 Swing Signals -- A couple of days ago we had 35 signals, today we have twice as many. Happily, we now have 65 BUY signals, a mere 4 SELL Signals plus 3 Strong BUYs. Whoo-hoo! 56 Trend Leaders , all in strong up-trends according to Aroon, MACD and DMI. There are 18 new stocks that made today's list and 60 that fell off Tuesday's list. 48 Trend Busters of which 5 are BUY signals and 43 are SELL signals The view from Alert HQ -- Talk about mixed signals. If you look at our Swing Signals list you would think the market was in the middle of a big bounce. BUY signals are swamping the SELL signals and we even have a few Strong BUYs. Yes, there's a good sprinkling of tech stocks and tech ETFs but the distribution is pretty broad-based with a good number of different sectors represented, eve

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here: Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.