Skip to main content

Sprint - Why WiMAX?

I was somewhat surprised when I heard that Sprint Nextel (S) was building a separate network based on WiMAX technology. This is not a replacement for its 3G cell phone system but in addition to it. Why would they do such a thing given the scale, complexity and cost? Are they doing this in the hope that if they build it, they (customers) will come?

So first of all, what is WiMAX and why is it significant?

Technically speaking, it is a 4G wireless broadband network that uses the mobile WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) IEEE 802.16e-2005 technology standard.

Why is that good? Because you can get high-speed Internet access with it for devices ranging from phones to PCs and devices we haven't thought of yet. And in this case, WiMAX "high-speed" is significantly faster than typical Internet access via current mobile phone technology. It will be a real data network, not a data pipe bolted onto a telecommunications network.

What could this lead to in the future?

Initially, Sprint is rolling out the product in the areas where it has the strongest coverage which, like most other cell companies, is centered on urban/suburban clusters. This will be a boon for those users who don't want to pay for wires, cable or fiber into their homes or businesses. It will allow companies, large and small, to string together Wi-Fi hotspots without running network cables. It will allow mobile workers, iPhone owners and others who want to take advantage of Internet services to access it anywhere in the coverage area and at speeds that allow for the enjoyment of video and music. It has the potential to finally make Internet access on hand-held devices a "must have" feature.

Another huge potential market for WiMAX, however, is in the rural areas in the US and elsewhere. The Millicom Cellular (MICC) model comes to mind. Where it is unprofitable to wire the environment, strategic placement of wireless towers can lead to high rates of adoption of the service. Sprint could get a first mover advantage in many parts of the country that have had no major telecom or broadband service.

As expensive as this initiative is, the fact that there is no need to cover the last mile to consumers' homes or businesses with wire or fiber is a large cost savings advantage that the cable and phone companies don't have. And the fact that users can be completely mobile should be a compelling attraction.

Sprint is looking to pull in $5 billion in revenue from the network by 2011, which is about what they estimate it will cost to build the system. If there is any reality to that estimate, it implies a pretty quick move to the break-even point.

If this really takes off, what other companies will profit?

Sprint has announced that they will be working with Intel (INTC), who has been instrumental in developing the WiMAX specification and WiMAX chipsets for PCs. They will also be working with Motorola (MOT), who could use another good source of revenue, and Samsung, who already has deployed mobile WiMAX in Asia.

Sprint has entered into an agreement with Craig McCaw's Clearwire (CLWR), who is also building a WiMAX network. This will allow customers to roam across both company's WiMAX networks much like cell phone users do.

Today, Sprint announced that they have chosen Zyxel Communications of Taiwan as its primary vendor for equipment needed to bring broadband Internet into customers' homes and businesses. BloggingStocks had a nice little post on the topic and why it was a smart move.


So, after looking into this, it appears Sprint is not so crazy after all. Nevertheless, given the cost of the initiative and the less than stellar performance turned in by the company lately, it is clearly a risky, bold move on the part of Sprint management. They might just be betting the company on this. As a consumer, though, I hope they succeed.

Disclosure: author does not own any of the stocks mentioned in this article


Anonymous said…
Sprint is quite a bit better at researching new technology than deploying it. They are hedging this huge bet with an accellerating their roll out of CDMA Rev. A, which may be their parachute if Wimax doesn't take off like wildfire.

WiMax still has many question marks, some of which are potential deal breakers for a truly "mobile" experience.
My experience with Sprint cellular service a couple of years ago would seem to bear out your first point - we ended up switching to Verizon. As to your last point, time will tell.
Unknown said…
1. Sprints new WIMAX network (based on 2.5Ghz spectrum) is not a 4G network. Marketing spin. The industry has defined 4G totally differently and will be able to deliver bandwidth levels over 60Mbps.
2. Sprints and any other 2.5Ghz based system will be severally limited in rural markets becuase of the foliage/Canopy issues. Darn leaves absorb signal and do not reflect.
3. Most WiMAX systems deployed today are Fixed systems and not the new Mobile (802.16e). These fixed nets work very nicely in Urban markets (T-1 replacement) where one has good line of site or can use structures to reflect (OFDMA) signals.
4. When SPrint/Clearwire/Intel and others adopt the new 700Mhz spectrum and wrap it in WiMAX features they will have what I call a true Broadband (Mobile/Fixed) wireless distribution system addressing all Urban and Rural markets.
5. Intel will eventually update their Centrino line to handle only 2 radios: 700Mhz based WiMAX systems and the new 802.11n (dual 2.4 &5Ghz)WiFi products. We'd then have a combination of WiMAX and WiFi Mesh systems delivering most all Broadband data to fixed and mobile systems.

Whoever wins the Nationwdie License for 700Mhz will set the direction in the industry for last mile Broadband-PERIOD.
The rest of the market will be FTTPremise.


Popular posts from this blog

Running TradeRadar on Windows 7 and Windows 8

Development of the original TradeRadar Stock Inspector software was begun back in the days before Windows 7 and Windows 8 were available.

As these newer versions of Windows have become more popular, we have heard from some users that they are having problems installing and running TradeRadar on their newer PCs.

The good news is that TradeRadar will work just fine on Windows 7 and Windows 8. All you have to do is adjust the Windows Compatibility Settings to ensure TradeRadar runs as intended.

It is recommended that you can apply Compatibility Settings when running the initial installation; however, it is also possible to apply Compatibility Settings after the program has been installed.

Prior to installation
After downloading the install program, go to the folder where you have stored the TradeRadarStkInsp_7_Setup.exe or TradeRadarStkInsp_7_PRO_Setup.exe executable. Right-click on the executable file and select Properties. Click the Compatibility tab. Adjust the Compatibility mode to …

Alert HQ has moved!

End of an era!

This site was started way back in 2006/2007 to showcase my blog posts and the Alert HQ buy signals and sell signals. Alert HQ grew to include other kinds of stock alerts including Swing Signals, Trend Busters, Trend Leaders, Cash Flow Kings and more.

In the meantime, I built a sister site, and I started using some of the same Alert HQ content over there. As a result, I am discontinuing the Alert HQ data here at

The good news, however, is that all the Alert HQ signals and stock screens are still completely free. In addition, the pages have been enhanced so that you can hover over a stock symbol and a small chart will pop up so you can get a quick look at the stock's recent price action. If you click on a symbol it will take you to a page with plenty of financial and technical analysis information (still free!) as well as a larger chart that you can play with in terms of adding or deleting indicators, moving averages, etc.

Click …

Durable Goods report for Sept just so-so but Computer segment is on fire

The Durable Goods advanced report for September 2011 was released on Wednesday.

I like to dig into the Durable Goods report because it can be useful for seeing how tech in aggregate is performing and how the sector may perform in the future. I always focus on two particular measures: shipments and new orders. Let's see how it played out last month.

Shipments -- 

I generally give less importance to Shipments since this is a backward looking measure reflecting orders that have been confirmed, manufactured and shipped. It's similar to earnings reports -- it's good to know but the data is in the past and we're more interested in the future. The following chart shows how September shipments looked for the overall tech sector:

Results for the overall tech sector were a bit weak but take a look at the next chart which tracks the Computers and related products segment:

Results here were actually quite good and, to make things even better, the previous month was revised upward.