Skip to main content

The importance of backtesting -- fixing Trend Busters

I've been working hard to roll out new features at Alert HQ. I always try to do some backtesting to verify that these features are working as anticipated. Actually running the various screens and putting out the results at Alert HQ, though, always yields new insights.

For example, I recently introduced Trend Busters. This was an attempt to implement a system that would identify the recent trend and determine whether that trend had been violated. This was initially rolled out using a simple test: if the trend was pointing upward and the most recent price was 5% below the trend then it was a SELL signal. If the trend was heading downward and the most recent price was 5% above the trend then it was a BUY signal. This seemed to be pretty workable but in practice it turns out that sideways action will trigger a false signal.

This post is to explain some of the changes that have been implemented to make the Trend Busters signals more accurate. Here are some of the improvements we have made to BUY signals:
  • Verify that the closing price of the most recent day is higher than the closing price of the previous day
  • Verify that the low price of the most recent day is higher than the low price of the previous day
  • Verify that the closing price of the most recent day is at least 5% higher the closing price of the day when the most recent minimum price was established
  • Verify the most recent day's low price is higher than the high of the day when the most recent minimum price was established
For SELL signals, the conditions are essentially the opposite.

Our recent backtesting has validated that this new system rejects the most questionable signals. I am excited to roll out the new Trend Busters. The list will certainly be shorter than it has been in the past but the stocks and ETFs that do make the list will be much better candidates for the Trend Busters title. Be sure to check them out when the newest list is released this Saturday (tomorrow!).

For details on how the original process worked click (here) to read the introductory post.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here:   https://tradingstockalerts.com/software/downloadpatch Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.
Post a Comment
Read more

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #4

This is the fourth article in a series of posts describing 10 tools to help you identify and evaluate good investing ideas. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. ( Click here to read the original post ) With this fourth post, we will continue another step along the path of finding stocks that seem to have some potential. The first post in the series discussed how to use unusual activity to identify investing ideas. The second post described how to use stock screeners. The third post described how to use lists of new highs and new lows. This post will focus on identifying social or business trends in order to find investing ideas. Information on new trends might turn up anywhere. In conversation with friends or business associates, in newspapers or magazines, on TV or though your work. The key is to be aware of trends and how they start, stop or change. We'll start by describing what...
6 comments
Read more

Business Intelligence consolidation - who's next?

We have seen a consolidation wave begin in the Business Intelligence space. IBM just bought Cognos and Oracle recently bought Hyperion. SAP just announced they are buying Business Objects after barely having time to digest their recent acquisition of Pilot Software. There are three major database vendors at this time: IBM with their DB2 product, Oracle with their flagship Oracle database and Microsoft with their SQL Server database. IBM and Oracle now have premier, industrial-strength data analysis and reporting products in their product portfolios that complement their core database products. Microsoft has what, Excel? Actually, Microsoft, like IBM and Oracle, has a suite of proprietary tools that do happen to integrate very well with Excel and SQL Server. Still, IT departments are not deploying the Microsoft tools for heavy-duty corporate use. Microsoft is unique among the big three by their lack of a premier reporting product. It seems safe to assume that Microsoft will be the next...
1 comment
Read more