Skip to main content

VMware faces pressure from all sides

The squeeze is on.

VMware (VMW) has been hammered lately as its CEO was replaced and the chief scientist walked out. The company was once the undisputed leader in server and desktop virtualization but competitors are making inroads.

We have seen the repeatedly delayed Microsoft Hyper-V virtualization product finally come to market. Several improvements are in the works to make it more robust for enterprise markets (adding the ability to move virtual machines with no downtime, for example) but the product is certainly usable right now. Its integration into Windows Server 2008 makes it a cheap and easy alternative for IT shops using the Microsoft platform.

We have seen Citrix purchase VMware rival Xen. Citrix is throwing its marketing and financial muscle behind Xen to establish the product as serious competition to VMware and the perfect complement to the standard Citrix presentation server implementation.

It is no surprise that IBM is also playing in VMware's sandbox. IBM is large enough that it tends to have some kind of product for nearly every IT segment so of course it has a virtualization product, too.

Server Virtualization versus Desktop Virtualization --

The first approach successfully commercialized was server virtualization. Server virtualization is a generalized term describing the ability to host multiple complete Operating System images such as Windows or Linux (including or excluding a kernel) on a single hardware platform. Server virtualization is often used to consolidate multiple smaller (or older) servers onto a single, large server, without changing how the applications or OS is managed. A software layer known as a hypervisor allows multiple operating systems to run on the same physical hardware.

Desktop Virtualization refers to a thin client architecture in which each user is assigned a virtual machine (OS and applications) in a virtualized server in the network. This means that a user's PC acts merely as a KVM (keyboard, video display, and mouse) over a network to a centrally hosted desktop.

IBM trying to play the disruptor --

The VMware and Microsoft solutions work fine but suffer from certain limitations: VMWare has more complicated storage requirements. Microsoft has less complicated storage and server requirements but more limited choices.

IBM is set to debut a technology at the VMWorld conference in Las Vegas that executives say reduces storage costs for virtual desktop storage by up to 80 percent.

The advantage over Microsoft and VMware: less storage required yielding less complexity, lower cost and faster deployments.

Conclusion --

IBM is so huge this development will not make a significant impact on the company's bottom line. For VMware, however, it is just one more challenge for the company to overcome at a time when the challenges seem to be multiplying daily. When your whole business is virtualization, these kinds of troubles can put a company like VMware on the defensive.

I hate to pile on VMware here at a time when the stock is already under pressure but the company is certainly running into tough times. VMware is not sitting on its hands; it is also making announcements at VMWorld. They are publicizing their concept of the virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) that will allow users to access their data and applications from practically any device. Unfortunately, this functionality is still in the realm of vapor-ware and not expected to be available until sometime next year or later.

As an investment, VMware's days as a rocket stock are behind it. Despite a strong franchise, the company has many question marks around the impact of its growing competition. For now, investors should be taking a "show me" attitude toward the company.

Disclosure: none

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #1

This is the first in an ongoing series of articles where I discuss what I feel are keys to successful investing. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. (Click here to read the original post)

There are two basic steps to investing. First, you need to find stocks that seem to have some potential. Then you have to determine whether these stocks are actually good investments. There are many stocks that at first glance look interesting, but further research reveals that there are too many negatives to warrant taking a position.

This first post in the series starts at the beginning: getting good investment ideas.

Key #1: If something special is happening to a stock, it will be reflected in some kind of unusual activity in the markets.

As individual investors, we will never be the first to know; however, unusual activity can be an early sign that allows us to follow the Wall Street professionals and …

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #4

This is the fourth article in a series of posts describing 10 tools to help you identify and evaluate good investing ideas. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. (Click here to read the original post)

With this fourth post, we will continue another step along the path of finding stocks that seem to have some potential. The first post in the series discussed how to use unusual activity to identify investing ideas. The second post described how to use stock screeners. The third post described how to use lists of new highs and new lows. This post will focus on identifying social or business trends in order to find investing ideas.

Information on new trends might turn up anywhere. In conversation with friends or business associates, in newspapers or magazines, on TV or though your work. The key is to be aware of trends and how they start, stop or change. We'll start by describing what to lo…

Durable Goods report for Sept just so-so but Computer segment is on fire

The Durable Goods advanced report for September 2011 was released on Wednesday.

I like to dig into the Durable Goods report because it can be useful for seeing how tech in aggregate is performing and how the sector may perform in the future. I always focus on two particular measures: shipments and new orders. Let's see how it played out last month.

Shipments -- 

I generally give less importance to Shipments since this is a backward looking measure reflecting orders that have been confirmed, manufactured and shipped. It's similar to earnings reports -- it's good to know but the data is in the past and we're more interested in the future. The following chart shows how September shipments looked for the overall tech sector:


Results for the overall tech sector were a bit weak but take a look at the next chart which tracks the Computers and related products segment:


Results here were actually quite good and, to make things even better, the previous month was revised upward.

N…