Skip to main content

Another industry in transformation?

It is well publicized that the financial industry is undergoing cataclysmic changes in terms of survival of companies, industry leadership, etc. Is there is another industry that is undergoing a similar transformation?

iSuppli, the market research firm, thinks so. They recently released a report indicating that major changes have been taking place in the semiconductor industry. Granted that the changes have been quieter and less dramatic.

Margins decrease --

They begin by saying that over time semiconductor industry profitably has shrunk. They point to a downtrend in margins and provide the following graph:

09-17-08 Semiconductor Industry Operating ProfitThe surprising quote from the article, written byDerek Lidow, president and chief executive officer of iSuppli, is as follows:
"The semiconductor industry now is less profitable as a percentage of revenue than the notoriously low-margin PC business... the long-term trend indicates that the semiconductor industry—which historically has been good at capturing profits in the electronics value chain—seems to have lost its money-making touch."

An industry transformed --

The report goes on to describe how, in the view of iSuppli, the semiconductor industry has changed. Previously, there were three categories of companies: the dominant companies whose growth outperformed the market, the middle tier consisting of most suppliers and the lower tier of low performers.

Now, according to iSuppli, we see the result of years of predatory take-overs to secure market share combined with failures of the weakest players. What is left is essentially a two tier system consisting of a group of top-performers and another group that includes pretty much everybody else. The result of the changes in the industry, as Mr. Lidow of iSuppli describes them, can be quantified as follows:
"The number of competitors achieving growth of more than 100 percent during the period of 2004 to 2007 declined to nine, down from 19 during the period of 2001 to 2004. This shows semiconductor companies can no longer break out of the pack by taking market share away from weaker rivals."
Their take is that n0w that the industry has been transformed, one of the favored ways of attaining dominance, via buying market share, is not working anymore.

The game changes --

One way to attain greater than market growth rates is to design more highly integrated chips comprising expanded functionality in system-level chips built around proprietary Intellectual Property (IP). iSuppli points to Qualcomm (QCOM), MediaTek Inc. and Linear Technology (LLTC) as companies that have successfully pursued this approach.

Another strategy is to milk established cash-cow products in the industry. Companies pursuing this approach include Microchip (MCHP), Diodes Inc. (DIOD), Microsemi (MSCC) and Rohm.

A third strategy, whose use is limited to the dominant players, is to out-spend competitors in product development and in developing manufacturing efficiency and scale. Companies who have used this approach include Samsung, Intel (INTC) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM).

With semiconductors increasingly becoming a commodity, iSuppli believes that it will soon begin to make sense for growing firms to pursue a strategy of continuous acquisitions to build a companies with great depth, large portfolios of products and the scale to deliver top quality technology with best in breed sales and marketing.

Conclusion --

iSuppli seems to be saying that the semiconductor industry is consolidating, profit margins are shrinking and there is no turning back. I'm not sure I totally agree with this analysis.

With the advent of the fab-less semiconductor company, it is easier than ever for small players to enter the industry. The history of the hi-tech industry has many examples of small companies developing unexpected, disruptive products that changed the balance of power in the industry. Granted it is harder than it used to be but I don't think that tradition is dead yet.

What do you think? Will semiconductors go the way of the PC industry?

Source: As Profit Dwindles, Semiconductor Market Becomes Less Forgiving

Disclosure: none

Comments

Anonymous said…
well they need to change many basic things
Anonymous said…
all the industries are in personal transformation era.

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation ...

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here:   https://tradingstockalerts.com/software/downloadpatch Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.

Time to be conservative with your 401K

Most of the posts I and other financial bloggers write are typically focused on individual stocks or ETFs and managing active portfolios. For those folks who are more conservative investors, those whose main investment vehicle is a 401K, for example, the techniques for portfolio management might be a little different. The news of stock markets falling and pundits predicting recession is disconcerting to professional investors as well as to those of us who are watching our balances in an IRA or 401K sag. What approach should the average 401K investor take? Let's assume that the investor is contributing on a regular basis to one of these retirement accounts. There are two questions that the investor needs to ask: 1. Should I stop putting the regular contribution into stocks? My feeling is that investors making regular contributions are being handed a present by the markets. Every week the market goes down, these investors are lowering their average cost. When markets reco...