Skip to main content

Bailouts for tech, too?

Thus far in this economic downturn, we have only seen financials and automakers receive bailout funds.

I have been thinking about writing a post on how the technology sector is not begging for bailouts and how that is a sign of better management and more resilient business models.

Now comes word that DRAM producers are asking the Taiwan government to help consolidate the local industry and bailout the major players. It appears Korea is thinking of doing something similar.

Trouble in memory chips --

Things are so bad for the DRAM vendors that Gartner estimates that they lose money on every PC that is shipped. They say it amounts to a $27.40 loss per PC, leading ultimately to a total loss among major vendors on the order of $2.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 alone. According to iSuppli Corp., DRAM vendors lost a combined $7 billion in 2008 and are expecting to see a further 15% revenue decline in 2009.

So it's clear that things are pretty bad in the commodity semiconductor sector and it looks like the affected companies are taking a page from the playbooks of the bank and auto CEO's. Here are the prime examples as described by EETimes:
"In Taiwan, DRAM maker Powerchip Semiconductor Corp. is pleading for a bailout from the Taiwanese government, while ProMos Technology Corp. and Nanya Technology Corp. are reportedly seeking similar measures. Powerchip's partner, Elpida Memory Inc., may end up rescuing the company via an acquisition.

In Korea, Hynix Semiconductor Corp. is seeking help from its creditors, but there are conflicting reports that the company is seeking a bail-out from the government. And in Germany, Qimonda AG could ask for help."
A bad precedent?

The technology sector has been known for its Darwinian characteristics. Companies rise and fall and come and go according to the dictates of the market. Waves of technology innovations create new winners and consign those companies who can no longer compete to the dustbin of history.

The success of the U.S. technology industry can be attributed to this rough and tumble environment where creativity and invention are rewarded, capital is allowed to quickly move to the places where it can do the most good and companies in trouble don't hang around too long.

Asking for a bailout overturns the whole notion that when it comes to tech, the market knows best. Propping up unprofitable companies would be a radical step in the technology industry. And in the case of the DRAM vendors, it's something not everyone thinks would be welcome.

"Widespread government support for the industry would be a disaster: It would just prolong the current downturn rather than forcing the vendors to further reduce production or causing consolidation," said Andrew Norwood, research vice president at Gartner Inc., in a report.

Almost sounds like he's talking about banks and their toxic assets...

Disclosure: none

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Thursday Bounce: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Trend Leaders for July 9, 2009

This is a quick post to announce that we have published Thursday's Trend Leaders, Swing Signals and Trend Busters at Alert HQ . All are based on daily data. Today we have the following: 72 Swing Signals -- A couple of days ago we had 35 signals, today we have twice as many. Happily, we now have 65 BUY signals, a mere 4 SELL Signals plus 3 Strong BUYs. Whoo-hoo! 56 Trend Leaders , all in strong up-trends according to Aroon, MACD and DMI. There are 18 new stocks that made today's list and 60 that fell off Tuesday's list. 48 Trend Busters of which 5 are BUY signals and 43 are SELL signals The view from Alert HQ -- Talk about mixed signals. If you look at our Swing Signals list you would think the market was in the middle of a big bounce. BUY signals are swamping the SELL signals and we even have a few Strong BUYs. Yes, there's a good sprinkling of tech stocks and tech ETFs but the distribution is pretty broad-based with a good number of different sectors represented, eve

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #1

This is the first in an ongoing series of articles where I discuss what I feel are keys to successful investing. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. ( Click here to read the original post ) There are two basic steps to investing. First, you need to find stocks that seem to have some potential. Then you have to determine whether these stocks are actually good investments. There are many stocks that at first glance look interesting, but further research reveals that there are too many negatives to warrant taking a position. This first post in the series starts at the beginning: getting good investment ideas. Key #1: If something special is happening to a stock, it will be reflected in some kind of unusual activity in the markets. As individual investors, we will never be the first to know; however, unusual activity can be an early sign that allows us to follow the Wall Street professional