Skip to main content

Part 2 - Time to get conservative with your 401K

Back in January when the market was going through its first set of gyrations and hitting a serious low I wrote a post titled "Time to get conservative with your 401K".

In that post I suggested that, in the interest of preserving capital, it might be a good idea to move approximately half of your 401K holdings into a stable value fund. It's true, this does have an element of market timing. On the other hand, there is nothing wrong with being defensive when it is clear that the market is in a serious downtrend. In fact, the post was somewhat inspired by the writing of Random Roger who advises that investors avoid allowing their portfolios to go "down a lot" though "down a little" is probably unavoidable in a down market.

With the Fed and the Treasury moving to support Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it is time to discuss this strategy again. At the time of the original post, there was a debate about the nature of the holdings of stable value funds. The funds are typically not very forthcoming on the specifics of their holdings. It is generally accepted, though, that most of these funds hold bonds, known as agency debt, issued by Fannie or Freddie. Agency debt generally holds the highest ratings, but investors have demanded a nominal spread over Treasury debt for perceived credit risk. These slightly higher spreads contribute to the higher interest rates offered by the stable value funds as compared to money market funds. As an indication of the safety of agency debt, however, the spreads are less than for other publicly traded companies since investors see government ties representing an implicit guarantee.

With Freddie and Fannie under pressure and accusations of insolvency being thrown about, I began to worry that stable value funds and some of the other so-called "cash" funds offered in 401K plans were perhaps not as safe as advertised. The stocks of the two GSEs have been decimated but the debt has been holding its value with spreads over Treasuries staying in a reasonable range.

Today, Freddie Mac offered $3 billion of short-term notes. This was not an unusual transaction but against the current backdrop it was looked at as somewhat of a test of investor confidence in the agency's debt. I was relieved to see that Freddie drew higher-than-average demand for the notes as the U.S. Treasury's rescue plan seemed to assure that the government will back the company's debt. The bid-to-cover ratio at Freddie's bill auction, gauging demand by comparing total bids with the amount of securities offered, was more than 50 percent above the average of the past three months.

In addition, the spreads have narrowed, showing that the market is pleased with the actions of the Treasury rather than alarmed.

So far, then, the stable value fund strategy is still safe. The debt of Freddie and Fannie retains its high rating and investor confidence. It may be wise, however, to dig into the stable value fund offered by your 401K plan to better ascertain the nature of its holdings. And just to be cautious, it would be reasonable to look at alternatives. For typical "flight to safety" purposes, a fund holding short-term treasuries or TIPS would be appropriate. You won't make much money in these kinds of investments but at least you can be pretty sure you will preserve capital.

For more on this topic, read Part 3.


Anonymous said…
You are so close....but so far. If you really want to know what's going on...try finding our what's in "Stable Value Funds". Bring a shovel.

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Thursday Bounce: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Trend Leaders for July 9, 2009

This is a quick post to announce that we have published Thursday's Trend Leaders, Swing Signals and Trend Busters at Alert HQ . All are based on daily data. Today we have the following: 72 Swing Signals -- A couple of days ago we had 35 signals, today we have twice as many. Happily, we now have 65 BUY signals, a mere 4 SELL Signals plus 3 Strong BUYs. Whoo-hoo! 56 Trend Leaders , all in strong up-trends according to Aroon, MACD and DMI. There are 18 new stocks that made today's list and 60 that fell off Tuesday's list. 48 Trend Busters of which 5 are BUY signals and 43 are SELL signals The view from Alert HQ -- Talk about mixed signals. If you look at our Swing Signals list you would think the market was in the middle of a big bounce. BUY signals are swamping the SELL signals and we even have a few Strong BUYs. Yes, there's a good sprinkling of tech stocks and tech ETFs but the distribution is pretty broad-based with a good number of different sectors represented, eve

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here: Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.