Skip to main content

7 day losing streak for the Dow but not every stock is plunging - value stock in the Ag sector is breaking out

After running Saturday morning's Alert HQ process I checked my "Reasonable Value" screen against the day's Trend Busters and Trend Leaders. For those of you who have not see one of my previous "Reasonable Value" posts, here are the criteria for the screen:
  • PE between 0 and 20
  • PEG between 0 and 1.3
  • Price-to-Sales less than 2
  • Debt-to-Equity less than 1
Today there is just one stock that passes this screen and it's from the Trend Busters list. The company is CF Industries Holdings (CF). The following chart shows why the stock is a Trend Buster:


On Friday, the stock popped up above the bearish trend line (in green). It now sits just below its 50-day moving average. From a technical analysis point of view, the bullish breakout over the downward trend line is a positive but buyers would need to have confirmation by seeing.the stock move above that 50-DMA. Supporting the bullish case, MACD and Williams %R show a change in trend to the upside is in the making. This is further supported by Slow Stochastics (not shown above).

Background and Financials --

OK, now we know why CF is a Trend Buster. Let's look at why the company passes the "reasonable value" screen.

First of all, CF Industries is basically a producer of fertilizer, primarily nitrogen and phosphates. The company has a market cap of $4.6 billion, a trailing PE of 11 and a forward PE of less than 9. PEG is a mere 0.57 and the Enterprise Value / EBITDA ratio is less than 5. The Price-to-Sales ratio is 1.9 and Debt-to-Equity is nearly zero. All these measures suggest deep value.

I mentioned above that the company has a market cap of $4.6 billion. You might be interested to know that they are holding over $1 billion in cash. In addition, they pay an annual dividend of $0.60.

There's more good news from the point of view of fundamental analysis. Take a look at some of the measures calculated by my Trade-Radar software:
  • Annualized cash flow yield which, at 1.52%, is a little low but still positive
  • Cash flow to debt coverage is excellent
  • Survivability (debt less than 3 times EBITDA) is also excellent given that EBITDA is $731 million and debt is less than $5 million
  • Dividend is sustainable based on it being less than 60% of Diluted EPS which in the last 12 months was over $6
  • Management effectiveness is good based on the fact that Return-on-Equity and Return-on-Assets are both in the teens, 19% and 15% respectively.
  • Price-to-book is less than 2
All this points to a company that is financially quite sound and qualifies to be considered as a value stock. So why did the stock take such a hit before its recent upturn? The following chart from Google Finance has the answer:


The company has struggled during the economic downturn as demand and prices declined. Revenue, earnings and margins are all down. You may remember some of the high flying potash producer stocks from 2006 and 2007 that have since crashed. CF is not a potash producer, focusing as I mentioned above on nitrogen and phosphates, but its stock price followed the same trajectory. Driven by the big move into ethanol, planting of corn skyrocketed and the need for fertilizer followed. The growth in the market for ethanol has since slowed.

The outlook --

Back in June, the Department of Agriculture provided a bullish report on corn and soybeans. This is a positive for the fertilizer stocks because corn requires more kinds of fertilizer than many other crops. CF and others popped on the news.

Here are a few other items that suggest the recovery is real for CF.

Management's outlook during the first quarter conference call was bullish. They pointed to low costs for natural gas that conferred advantages for their nitrogen business and added they were exporting nitrogen-based fertilizers to Australia, Mexico and Chile. This is notable as their primary market is in the U.S. The negative aspect of first quarter results was the result of downward pressure on prices in both segments of the company's business.

Looking ahead, management points to reasonable prices for natural gas, increased corn planting, beneficial planting conditions and better expectations for the nitrogen business due to a pick-up in ammonia sales in April and even price increases in the ammonia business. The effects of ethanol are still being felt in the industry.Though the ramp up is not as extreme as in 2006 and 2007, ethanol production continues to slowly increase. This results in more corn planting and growing demand for fertilizer. Corn prices also seem to be in a range that are optimal for the fertilizer companies, encouraging farmers to plant corn and supporting fertilizer company margins.

CF Industries recently acquired Terra Nitrogen Company and the acquisition seems to be proceeding well with nitrogen sales in the first quarter coming in above expectations. Indeed, Terra reported improved net income despite falling prices. The combination of the two companies is also expected to yield efficiencies that will result in cost reductions.

Broadpoint AmTech reiterated a Buy rating on CF Industries on June 15, noting that "patient investors should take advantage of the pullback in fertilizer stocks." Nice call as the stock price more or less began its recovery around that time. Among others, hedge fund Passport Capital also maintains a position in CF.

If things play out as well as management projects, CF's stock price should continue the breakout that we see happening this week. Considering that the stock is well within the value range, any downside should be limited. If you are a value investor, CF appears to be an excellent candidate. If you subscribe to technical analysis, CF appears to show great potential in this case, as well. This is one stock that deserves a place on your watch list.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here:   https://tradingstockalerts.com/software/downloadpatch Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.

Time to be conservative with your 401K

Most of the posts I and other financial bloggers write are typically focused on individual stocks or ETFs and managing active portfolios. For those folks who are more conservative investors, those whose main investment vehicle is a 401K, for example, the techniques for portfolio management might be a little different. The news of stock markets falling and pundits predicting recession is disconcerting to professional investors as well as to those of us who are watching our balances in an IRA or 401K sag. What approach should the average 401K investor take? Let's assume that the investor is contributing on a regular basis to one of these retirement accounts. There are two questions that the investor needs to ask: 1. Should I stop putting the regular contribution into stocks? My feeling is that investors making regular contributions are being handed a present by the markets. Every week the market goes down, these investors are lowering their average cost. When markets reco