Intel (INTC) and Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) announced an agreement this week where TSMC would gain the rights to use Intel Atom processors as part of custom "system-on-a-chip" devices. These devices would be customized by TSMC according to individual customers requirements. The expectation is that the chips would be used in everything from netbooks to handheld gadgets. This is a good deal for both companies. TSMC has a new solution to offer its customers and Intel will more easily be able to get its processors in new devices such as smartphones.
This seems to be an extension of Intel's strategy of moving into new markets. The company has been trying to push into "mobile Internet devices" or MIDs. These MIDs are intended to be based on the Atom chip and Intel is working on a smaller, lower-powered version tailored to use in cellphones, smartphones, automotive systems and other yet to be determined devices.
Intel's work is cut out for it. ARM processors, made by the British company ARM Holdings Plc (ARMH), are currently the market leaders and are used in many well-known devices made by Apple, Palm and others. They have attained this status by being highly customizable and by being very power efficient. And also because small, lightweight operating systems can run on them.
Apparently, Intel is looking to use Linux as their lightweight operating system on MIDs and the company has been hiring top Linux developers to jumpstart the programming effort.
So if the various versions of the Atom processor find their way into popular devices, and that is a big "if" given Intel's less than stellar performance in the mobile space thus far, the next battle will be over software. Intel is committing to Linux but what about long-time partner Microsoft?
Microsoft's Windows operating system already runs on Atom chips. I can't imagine Microsoft not trying to push Windows Mobile or some stripped down version of the upcoming Windows 7 onto some of these devices. As much as Microsoft must be irritated that Intel is committing to Linux, I suspect that Microsoft is hoping Intel's push into new markets will be wildly successful. Where the Atom goes, Microsoft can follow.
Disclosure: none
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Who else benefits from Intel - TSMC partnership?
Blog Archive
-
►
2010
(153)
-
►
August
(15)
- With your ideas we can build a better Alert HQ tog...
- Total Return Ratio -- 11 stocks John Neff might ha...
- Intel cuts outlook -- confirms cautionary signal i...
- Stock Inspector Tips & Tricks -- fix bad "flash cr...
- June Durable Goods -- mixed signals from tech keep...
- Is company guidance worth listening to?
- Q2 earnings scorecard -- believe the guidance or b...
- Two reasonable value stocks raising dividends this...
- Analysts can't agree on outlook for semiconductors...
- Google keeps getting social - and stands to make m...
- A week without posting - here's what I've been up ...
- 15 under-valued stocks to buy on a pullback
- Does finding winning stocks have to be so hard?
- Three weeks of earnings -- it's clear which sector...
- Stocks take a rest -- will they wake up rejuvenate...
-
►
July
(16)
- June Durable Goods -- Tech sector at a tipping poi...
- Earnings finally matter -- and the market recovers...
- Agriculture sector is on fire -- here's a roundup ...
- Value stock with a growth stock chart -- RLI could...
- Earnings scorecard -- two weeks in, where's the ev...
- Stocks show gains two days in a row -- is the rall...
- Bond ETF reversal alert -- but will the rally cont...
- All it takes is one bad day and advantage goes to ...
- Weekly ProShares Review -- foreign stocks grab inv...
- An update to Trade-Radar Stock Inspector is availa...
- Heads up! -- 4 Reasonable Value stocks starting t...
- Market turns on a dime last week -- now, fundament...
- One bad month of data and the wheels come off -- c...
- 7 day losing streak for the Dow but not every stoc...
- 8 steps to simpler investing
- After being wrong for two weeks, am I finally seei...
-
►
June
(16)
- Not dead yet
- May Durable Goods -- Tech wavers but the trend is ...
- Humana tops our "reasonable value" list with some ...
- Weekly ProShares review -- bulls still at work but...
- Say what you will about the fundamentals -- this m...
- Value by Industry -- how do your favorite sectors ...
- Time to buy -- little known small cap could be Gul...
- Weekly ProShares review shows bulls in the ascenda...
- Dare I say it? --- the bottom is in (well, maybe)
- Stocks hold their gains for a whole day -- is it g...
- Warning signs for semiconductors?
- Slide show demonstrates ease of use of new Trade-R...
- Ride the momentum train -- this week's strongest P...
- Mr. Market trips over jobs report - bulls left hid...
- Weekend Winners and Losers for June 4, 2010
- Android - smartest thing Google has done lately?
-
►
August
(15)
-
▼
2009
(312)
-
▼
March
(24)
- Turnaround in the the DRAM sector? What might that...
- Weekly Review - rally looking extended, time for a...
- New Swing Trading Signals for March 27, 2009
- Free stock alerts, Trend Leaders, Bollinger Band B...
- Durable Goods - tech sector still under pressure?
- Are tech stocks expensive?
- Introducing TradeRadar Swing Signals - signs the m...
- Free stock alerts, Trend Leaders, Bollinger Band B...
- Semiconductor Equipment Manufacturers - what does ...
- Fed goes for "shock and awe"
- Industrial Production - when "less bad" is good en...
- Do Charge-off Rates impact the UltraShort Real Est...
- Weekly Review - can bulls make it two weeks in a r...
- Free stock alerts, Trend Leaders, Bollinger Band B...
- Announcing release of TradeRadar software version ...
- Starent Networks - in the sweet spot
- Is Qualcomm going up against Intel?
- Weekly Review - a very consistent market: all bad ...
- Free stock alerts, Trend Leaders, Bollinger Band B...
- ProShares ETF links - the big list for Mar 5, 2009...
- Who else benefits from Intel - TSMC partnership?
- Picture of the bear
- Weekly Review - good riddance to February
- Free stock alerts, Trend Leaders, Bollinger Band B...
-
▼
March
(24)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |



Subscribe to













0 comments:
Post a Comment