Skip to main content

How long does it take Swing Trading Signals to achieve profitability?

We offer free Swing Trading BUY and SELL signals. This post looks into performance over time of the BUY signals.

Quick background. The TradeRadar Swing Trading Signals are primarily based on Bollinger Bands. For the BUY signal, we look for the closing price to dip below the lower band and then pop back up above the lower band. We apply a proprietary set of criteria to ensure that the "pop" was strong enough to suggest a viable BUY. We also use Williams %R to check whether the price is in the process of recovering from an over-sold condition.

The analysis --

I took the signals that were generated over the weekend on Saturday mornings as well as all the signals that were generated on Tuesdays and Thursdays. I looked at each set of signals separately and charted the results.

I looked at how many BUY signals were profitable after 1 week had elapsed, after 2 weeks had elapsed, after 3 weeks, etc. I used a weekly increment because we only run our tracking program on the weekend. This gives us a week-by-week status on our picks. A percentage (the left hand axis in the chart below) is generated by calculating the number of profitable signals divided by the total number of signals. (Yes, I admit it: not every single signal is profitable.)

This chart shows the results:

Swing Signals - Weeks To Profit
For Thursday and Saturday signals we start out with about 40% of the picks being profitable after one week. After four or five weeks, though, we are seeing that roughly 70% to 80% of picks are showing profits. Not a bad track record.

For the Tuesday signals, more stocks are profitable within the first week and the performance is more consistent as the weeks go by.

Final thoughts --

The analysis above leads to two questions:
  1. This analysis does not imply that every BUY signal works out the same since, obviously, not every stock is the same. Frankly, though, I was surprised by the results. I had expected that most picks would see profitability attained after 2 or 3 weeks and then the number showing profits would decrease. What's going on here?
  2. Many explanations of Swing Trading suggest that the typical holding period is a few days to a few weeks. The analysis presented above implies that stocks should be held for a somewhat longer period. Why might that be?
I suspect the answer to both questions has to do with how the market has been trending. Since March, we have had a strongly trending bull market. It has enabled the BUY signals, which were bets on the price cycle of the stocks in question, to continue to show gains over a longer period. The expectation was that the stocks would oscillate between their upper and lower Bollinger Bands but a general lift in the market is allowing many of picks to continue showing gains over the course of months.

This is another sign that for the last six months it's been a pretty good environment for investors.

If you're interested in following our Swing Signals, they are refreshed three times a week: every Tuesday and Thursday night and on Saturday.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here:   https://tradingstockalerts.com/software/downloadpatch Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.

Interactive Ads - Google one-ups Yahoo again

Google's ( GOOG ) press release describing the expansion of a beta program for what are being called Gadget Ads has again shown that Google is unparalleled at melding technology and advertising to benefit its bottom line. Gadget Ads are mini-web pages or "widgets" that can be embedded within publisher pages. I have written in the past on Yahoo's ( YHOO ) Smart Ads and how, by more precisely targeting site users and adjusting ad content accordingly, they provide a much desired evolution of the banner or display ad format. Though Smart Ads and Gadget Ads are not really the same, I think it is fair to say that Google has seen the challenge of Smart Ads and has chosen to leapfrog Yahoo by rolling out its own update to the display ad format. The evolution of the Gadget Ad -- One of the trends on the Internet over the last year or so involves software developers creating "widgets" which can be hosted within web pages and blogs. Widgets can be pretty much anything