Skip to main content

UltraShort ETFs - they work if you follow the rules

Bashing the ProShares UltraShort ETFs seems to be a favorite blog topic these days but it has also incited a few defenders of these ETFs to respond.

To review, those who dislike these ETFs have pointed to the fact that they do not seem to have come anywhere near delivering the expected result of double the inverse of the underlying index. Indeed, they might not have shown any gain at all even if the underlying index lost significant value.

Evaluating the arguments --

Let's take a look at the following scenario: buy an UltraShort ETF when the corresponding long index ETF falls below its 200-day simple moving average.

We looked at four pairs of ETFs as described in the following tables. The Start Date corresponds to when the index ETF fell below its 200-day MA. Standard Deviation is included as a measure of volatility.

This first table shows the results using ETFs that correspond to two major market averages.

Start Date1/9/08
End Date1/16/09
Initial Price47.7537.01137.8747.48
Recent Price28.9058.9583.1181.11
Percent change-39.48%59.28%-39.72%70.83%
Standard Deviation7.3011.5719.2813.83

This next table shows the results of using ETFs that track two individual sectors: real estate and financials.

Start Date6/18/07
End Date1/16/09
Initial Price76.3077.93109.2775.94
Recent Price32.2259.3233.86158.78
Percent change-57.77%-18.61-75.4182.84
Standard Deviation12.6321.6920.6827.35

The outcome --

What we found was that one of the sector UltraShorts, SRS, the UltraShort Real Estate ETF, did indeed perform horribly over the long haul. The other ETFs we examined didn't do too badly. They may have lagged the hoped for 2X inverse of the underlying index but they did way better than the underlying indexes did as stocks plunged this year.

At this point it is important to reiterate what ProShares says about these ETFs: they are meant to double the inverse of the underlying index on a daily basis, not over extended periods of time.

Others have written how compounding over time can affect these kinds of leveraged ETFs so I won't go into detail here; suffice to say that they are correct and that it tends to keep the gains less than the expected 2X.

Use the right tool for the right job --

What is important to point out is that indulging in these ETFs is essentially a commitment to, at the least, market timing or even active trading. This by itself implies that the intent is probably not long-term hedging.

So if you are willing to actively trade the UltraShort ETFs, then they will work quite well. This does not necessarily mean day trading. Handsome gains were had in SKF, for example, if an investor bought this ETF each time it fell back to around its 200-day MA, held it for a few weeks or months and sold each time it spiked. For most folks, of course, this is easier said than done but if you were good at determining stops, it was still quite possible.

What is more noticeable (and useful) from the data presented above is that a bearish investor, betting against a major market average like the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ 100, could indeed have held the corresponding UltraShort ETF and realized a quite reasonable gain over the course of the last 12 months.

Sour grapes?

So in my opinion, it seems that those who are railing against these ETFs are not using them as they were intended and are judging them by criteria they were not intended to be judged by. In addition, this attitude that the UltraShorts are awful investments is very much a result of what end date is used. A few months ago, when SRS on two occasions rose to over $175, I don't think anyone would have been complaining about this ETF. Furthermore, it is clear that the volatility of this ETF is very high and wild price swings are to be expected. Lesson: be careful, pay attention and take profits when you can. Otherwise, don't complain.

Major market averages do pay off --

Playing individual sectors, especially the highly volatile financial and real estate sectors, may yield unpredictable results.

In a cyclical bear market, however, using the UltraShorts that correspond to the major market averages has actually worked out quite well, even if holding these ETFs for longer periods than recommended. I have provided the details for the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ 100 but the results are the same for the Dow 30 Industrials (comparing DIA and DXD) and the Russell 2000 (comparing IWM and TWM).

The rules of the game --

It seems there are four rules for using the ProShares UltraShorts:
  1. Pay attention. When an ETF jumps 20 or 30 points in a day, it is probably a good idea to take some profits.
  2. Some of the most volatile sector ETFs should only be used as trading vehicles over shorter periods of time. This should be evaluated on a case by case basis. Also, see rule #1.
  3. The ETFs that correspond to major market averages (referred to by ProShares as "short market cap" ETFs) can be considered "dual purpose": use them for longer bets on cyclic bear markets or as trading vehicles if you are nimble enough.
  4. Have an exit strategy. Set a point at which "enough is enough" and have the discipline to take profits. Don't assume a 2X return over longer periods of time.
Are there any other rules you think should be added?

Disclosure: small positions in SDS and QID


Popular posts from this blog

Running TradeRadar on Windows 7 and Windows 8

Development of the original TradeRadar Stock Inspector software was begun back in the days before Windows 7 and Windows 8 were available.

As these newer versions of Windows have become more popular, we have heard from some users that they are having problems installing and running TradeRadar on their newer PCs.

The good news is that TradeRadar will work just fine on Windows 7 and Windows 8. All you have to do is adjust the Windows Compatibility Settings to ensure TradeRadar runs as intended.

It is recommended that you can apply Compatibility Settings when running the initial installation; however, it is also possible to apply Compatibility Settings after the program has been installed.

Prior to installation
After downloading the install program, go to the folder where you have stored the TradeRadarStkInsp_7_Setup.exe or TradeRadarStkInsp_7_PRO_Setup.exe executable. Right-click on the executable file and select Properties. Click the Compatibility tab. Adjust the Compatibility mode to …

Alert HQ has moved!

End of an era!

This site was started way back in 2006/2007 to showcase my blog posts and the Alert HQ buy signals and sell signals. Alert HQ grew to include other kinds of stock alerts including Swing Signals, Trend Busters, Trend Leaders, Cash Flow Kings and more.

In the meantime, I built a sister site, and I started using some of the same Alert HQ content over there. As a result, I am discontinuing the Alert HQ data here at

The good news, however, is that all the Alert HQ signals and stock screens are still completely free. In addition, the pages have been enhanced so that you can hover over a stock symbol and a small chart will pop up so you can get a quick look at the stock's recent price action. If you click on a symbol it will take you to a page with plenty of financial and technical analysis information (still free!) as well as a larger chart that you can play with in terms of adding or deleting indicators, moving averages, etc.

Click …

Durable Goods report for Sept just so-so but Computer segment is on fire

The Durable Goods advanced report for September 2011 was released on Wednesday.

I like to dig into the Durable Goods report because it can be useful for seeing how tech in aggregate is performing and how the sector may perform in the future. I always focus on two particular measures: shipments and new orders. Let's see how it played out last month.

Shipments -- 

I generally give less importance to Shipments since this is a backward looking measure reflecting orders that have been confirmed, manufactured and shipped. It's similar to earnings reports -- it's good to know but the data is in the past and we're more interested in the future. The following chart shows how September shipments looked for the overall tech sector:

Results for the overall tech sector were a bit weak but take a look at the next chart which tracks the Computers and related products segment:

Results here were actually quite good and, to make things even better, the previous month was revised upward.