Last week markets received some pretty ugly news related to employment, or the lack thereof. ADP came out with their estimate of nearly 700,000 jobs lost in December. The Bureaus of Labor Statistics released their non-farm payrolls report which included job losses of 524,000 and an unemployment rate hitting 7.2%.
Big numbers but what do they mean? And how do they compare to unemployment in previous downturns? I'd like to share with readers the following two charts from Citi's "Comments on Credit" that provide some interesting comparisons.
Citi has looked at job losses over time starting at the cyclical peak of the stock market prior to each recession. They have plotted this data for the current recession and compared it to the same data for several earlier recessions. The have further differentiated between "mild" recessions and "deep" recessions.
Job losses --
This first chart shows job losses. Our current recession is the blue line. Note that it is showing more job losses than the previous "deep" recessions. On the other hand, it seems right on schedule in terms of hitting an extreme level about 13 months after the peak.
An optimist might look at this chart and determine that we should be on schedule to see job gains soon, much as we experienced in previous "deep" recessions. Unfortunately, most observers are expecting job losses to continue through the rest of this year, causing the blue line to drive deeper to the downside. Employment is only anticipated to begin to recover much later in 2009 or in 2010.
Unemployment --
This next chart shows how the unemployment rate changed from its starting level at the peak of the stock market over the course recession. Again, our current recession is the blue line.
In comparison to the line designating a "deep" recession, we see that unemployment had already starting slowly increasing a full year prior to our most recent stock market peak and has been accelerating for the last six months. Extrapolating from what we see in this chart, if our current recession is only as bad as previous "deep" recessions, we could expect to see unemployment top out just shy of 9%. That is in the ballpark of what many observers are predicting: peak unemployment of 9% to 10% during this cycle.
The big "if" --
It is unlikely that a new bull market can start until investors see that the unemployment rate is stabilizing and beginning to decline and that monthly job losses are moderating. If this current recession can be considered to be similar to past "deep" recessions, we may only have a few more months of extreme pain. The big "if" is whether this recession will be worse than other "deep" recessions.
Unfortunately, the consensus seems to be that this recession, by most measures, will be deeper than the previous "deep" recessions. The global nature of the downturn, the collapse in housing and manufacturing, the devastation in the financial sector and, as described here, the growing problem with unemployment, all point to a recession that promises to be worse than what Citi considered as "deep" in their analysis.
So the big "if" is looking more like the big "long shot" at this point. Better keep your fingers crossed.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
The big "if"
With the S&P 500 falling to a fresh two-week low, the big question is whether this is a correction, or the start of a major trend on the downside?
Our friends at MarketClub have just finished a short video that details many of the key concerns that we have for this market. If you have not seen one of their videos before you may enjoy this one. This video does not require a plug-in.
The video is free to watch and there is no need to register. I would love to get your feedback about this video on our blog.
I highly recommend students of the market take a few minutes and watch this timely video. Even if you’re a seasoned pro you may find what you see interesting and therefore profitable.
As always, this informative video is complimentary with no strings attached.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(167)
-
▼
July
(11)
- Hang tough Tuesday - Swing Signals, Trend Busters ...
- Did investors throw the baby out with the bathwate...
- Weekly Review - damage is done, time for a turnar...
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- Thursday Bounce: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and ...
- Terrible Tuesday - Swing Signals, Trend Busters an...
- Making it easier to calcuate stops for leveraged E...
- Weekly Review - the correction picks up speed, how...
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- 'Green Shoots' in the Semiconductor sector?
- Humble Thursday: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and ...
-
►
June
(27)
- Month End Tuesday - Swing Signals, Trend Busters a...
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- Thursday Trio: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Tr...
- Durable Goods Report - tech fundamentals finally b...
- One reason big tech will beat this quarter
- Bumpy Tuesday - Swing Signals, Trend Busters and T...
- How to use the TradeRadar software - new slideshow...
- Weekly Review - stocks look tired
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- What Bing might cost Google (it's not peanuts!)
- Thursday Trio: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Tr...
- Troublesome Tuesday - Swing Signals, Trend Buster...
- Small-Cap 'SuperList' - three stocks exploding to ...
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- Google on TV - is a starring role on the way?
- Thursday Trio: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Tr...
- Formal release of TradeRadar software version 4.1 ...
- Tuesday Swing Signals, Trend Busters and Trend Lea...
- Advance Release - TradeRadar Stock Analysis Softwa...
- Weekly Review - building toward better things?
- Performance Review - TradeRadar 'Strong BUY' Swing...
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- Thursday Trio: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Tr...
- Why is Data Domain such a hot acquisition candidat...
- Sector ETFs showing the most strength - signs this...
- Tuesday Swing Signals, Trend Busters and Trend Lea...
- LCD glass - a leading indicator?
-
►
May
(30)
- Weekly Review - where's my trend? I need a friend....
- Big Mo mixes in a little value
- Durable Goods report - trends to watch in the Tech...
- Weekend Winners and Losers - Alert HQ BUY and SELL...
- Thursday Trio: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Tr...
- SanDisk goes wild - was it justified?
- Tuesday Swing Signals, Trend Busters and Trend Lea...
- Weekly Review - support levels in play, enough to ...
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 22, 2009 -- Trend...
- Thursday Trio: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Tr...
- Surprising number of stocks increase dividends
- Tuesday Swing Signals, Trend Busters and Trend Lea...
-
▼
July
(11)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |

Subscribe to



- click for Related Content



0 comments:
Post a Comment