Skip to main content

Why is the SEC suddenly focused on leveraged ETFs?

The SEC has decided to take a closer look at derivatives as they are used by ETFs and mutual funds.

Here is what the SEC has said:
"Pending the review's completion, the staff has determined to defer consideration of exemptive requests under the Investment Company Act to permit ETFs that would make significant investments in derivatives. The staff's decision will affect new and pending exemptive requests from certain actively-managed and leveraged ETFs that particularly rely on swaps and other derivative instruments to achieve their investment objectives. The deferral does not affect any existing ETFs or other types of fund applications."
I used to write regularly about ProShares leveraged ETFs. Under the hood, leveraged ETFs, both the 2X or 3X and inverse 2X or 3X, make extensive use of derivatives. Swaps of one kind or another are commonly utilized to achieve results that are multiples of an underlying index.

Let's look at the ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) ETF that is intended to deliver twice the daily performance of the NASDAQ 100 index. According to the ProShares site, QLD daily holdings include over $200M in futures and nearly a $1B (notional value) in swaps. This is in contrast to other holdings of approximately $500M in the actual stocks that make up the NASDAQ 100 plus $340M in cash and other assets. Needless to say, it's primarily the swaps that gives this ETF its juice.

In effect then, a company like ProShares would not be able to bring to market any more leveraged ETFs. Fortunately for ProShares, the SEC announcement indicates that existing ETFs will not be affected.

Who does this SEC decision actually hurt?

Institutions always have more opportunities to use complicated or exotic investment techniques so the SEC decision will be merely an inconvenience.

Once again, it is the small investor who will see less choice in investment products. Sector and style-based ETFs have made it much easier for individual investors to make diversified bets on different areas of the U.S. and global economies. The leveraged long and short ETFs have been good vehicles for reasonably educated traders with a more short-term orientation.

So why all of a sudden the interest in leveraged ETFs? Is the SEC responding to political pressure to make it look like they are doing something about the barely regulated derivatives market? Is it easier to just dump on providers of ETFs and mutual funds than to actually go up against the investment banks and hedge funds that are primary players in the derivatives markets?

Read the SEC Press Release here.


Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here: Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.

Thursday Bounce: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Trend Leaders for July 9, 2009

This is a quick post to announce that we have published Thursday's Trend Leaders, Swing Signals and Trend Busters at Alert HQ . All are based on daily data. Today we have the following: 72 Swing Signals -- A couple of days ago we had 35 signals, today we have twice as many. Happily, we now have 65 BUY signals, a mere 4 SELL Signals plus 3 Strong BUYs. Whoo-hoo! 56 Trend Leaders , all in strong up-trends according to Aroon, MACD and DMI. There are 18 new stocks that made today's list and 60 that fell off Tuesday's list. 48 Trend Busters of which 5 are BUY signals and 43 are SELL signals The view from Alert HQ -- Talk about mixed signals. If you look at our Swing Signals list you would think the market was in the middle of a big bounce. BUY signals are swamping the SELL signals and we even have a few Strong BUYs. Yes, there's a good sprinkling of tech stocks and tech ETFs but the distribution is pretty broad-based with a good number of different sectors represented, eve