Skip to main content

Could automakers take same route as airlines?

When the going gets tough in a particular industry, the companies involved go to the government. When competitiveness has been lost, the non-competitive want to dump their pension plans.

This means they march to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, known as the PBGC.

Back around 2002 it was the steel industry. The following companies went to the PBGC to unload their pension plan responsibilities: Bethlehem Steel (one of the biggest plans to be terminated), National Steel, Northwestern Steel and Wire, Weirton Steel, Kaiser Steel and more. Many of these companies declared bankruptcy and shut down plants. Whatever was still valuable was sold off or merged into the remaining bigger, stronger steel companies that were still standing.

More recently, the airlines pulled a similar move: United Airlines, TWA, Aloha Airlines and US Airways all terminated their plans and turned them over to the PBGC. The difference in this case is that some of the companies had no intention of closing their doors for good. They took the descent into bankruptcy as an opportunity to trim down, shed liabilities and come back to fight another day.

As the automakers go to Washington to beg for funding for mergers that may or may not make sense, it is only a matter of time before the most wounded among them begins to evaluate the strategy the steel companies and airlines followed: declare bankruptcy and terminate the pension plan, allowing it to be taken over by the PBGC. Emerge from bankruptcy without the onerous and expensive need to support the thousands of retirees that increase the cost of each car produced. Instantly be more competitive with the Japanese and South Korean car companies.

According to the Wall Street Journal, GM alone provides health care and pensions for 480,000 retirees. This will cost the company over $64 billion between 2009 and 2017. In 2005, pension costs were estimated to add $700 to the cost of each car produced with health care costs adding another $1500. With the horrific performance of the stock market this year, the pension fund is projected to be underfunded by as much as $18 billion by the end of 2008.

There are already plans for GM to move their health care responsibilities to a trust managed by the UAW. It will cost them billions of dollars to do so and still they will remain uncompetitive. If GM can't find an entity that supports the merger with Chrysler, look for the company to fly the same route that the airlines took: straight to the PBGC.

Disclosure: none

Comments

knappador said…
I see the major problem of GM being rooted in their pursuance of SUV's via the tax breaks that were offered for SUV's up to 80k. Basically the big three couldn't compete in small cars because of the huge labor/pension cost per vehicle, but were okay whenever this cost was spread out over a larger vehicle. The underlying mistep hasn't been corrected with new products, but it also wouldn't be viable unless labor costs can be brought down. Basically it doesn't matter how good GM's small cars are because the margins will be wiped out by the higher labor costs.

Also, GM has gone with the Honda model of production, which is slightly slower to respond and higher in setup costs than the Toyota model. GM needs to get more fleet in manufacturing, more lean on pension load, and more focused on competition in smaller vehicles.

World oil production is only going to continue getting outpaced by growth in demand. This is going to produce more and more SUV-like contractions in spending on big cars and more spending on more economical transportation as time goes on. The general trend is set. I believe you're right that GM has no way to survive with its current UAW burden. GM is stuck between large vehicle market contraction and small vehicle low margins.

Popular posts from this blog

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #1

This is the first in an ongoing series of articles where I discuss what I feel are keys to successful investing. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. (Click here to read the original post)

There are two basic steps to investing. First, you need to find stocks that seem to have some potential. Then you have to determine whether these stocks are actually good investments. There are many stocks that at first glance look interesting, but further research reveals that there are too many negatives to warrant taking a position.

This first post in the series starts at the beginning: getting good investment ideas.

Key #1: If something special is happening to a stock, it will be reflected in some kind of unusual activity in the markets.

As individual investors, we will never be the first to know; however, unusual activity can be an early sign that allows us to follow the Wall Street professionals and …

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #4

This is the fourth article in a series of posts describing 10 tools to help you identify and evaluate good investing ideas. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. (Click here to read the original post)

With this fourth post, we will continue another step along the path of finding stocks that seem to have some potential. The first post in the series discussed how to use unusual activity to identify investing ideas. The second post described how to use stock screeners. The third post described how to use lists of new highs and new lows. This post will focus on identifying social or business trends in order to find investing ideas.

Information on new trends might turn up anywhere. In conversation with friends or business associates, in newspapers or magazines, on TV or though your work. The key is to be aware of trends and how they start, stop or change. We'll start by describing what to lo…

Durable Goods report for Sept just so-so but Computer segment is on fire

The Durable Goods advanced report for September 2011 was released on Wednesday.

I like to dig into the Durable Goods report because it can be useful for seeing how tech in aggregate is performing and how the sector may perform in the future. I always focus on two particular measures: shipments and new orders. Let's see how it played out last month.

Shipments -- 

I generally give less importance to Shipments since this is a backward looking measure reflecting orders that have been confirmed, manufactured and shipped. It's similar to earnings reports -- it's good to know but the data is in the past and we're more interested in the future. The following chart shows how September shipments looked for the overall tech sector:


Results for the overall tech sector were a bit weak but take a look at the next chart which tracks the Computers and related products segment:


Results here were actually quite good and, to make things even better, the previous month was revised upward.

N…