Skip to main content

Are semiconductor shipments a leading indicator of tech strength?

In looking at the recent Durable Goods report at http://www.economicindicators.gov/ it was striking to see that shipments for semiconductors were up over 25% from March to April.

Given that electronics manufacturers need to acquire semiconductors before they can assemble and ship their products, it is reasonable to assume that semiconductor shipments are a leading indicator of electronics manufacturing. To be more precise, semiconductor shipments would be a leading indicator of electronics manufacturing sales expectations.

On the surface, the 25% increase in semiconductor shipments appears to be very bullish. April 2008 shipments compared to April 2007 shipments, however, show a drop of more than 13.5% year-over-year. On a year-to-date basis, semiconductor shipments show a 7.9% drop in 2008 compared to 2007.

Looking at the year-to-date numbers for shipments for the other components of the Computers and Electronic Products sector, we see that there have been small percentage increases for both the Computers & Related Products sub-sector and the Communications Equipment sub-sector.

On a month-to-month basis, however, the Computers & Related Products sub-sector and the Communications Equipment sub-sector have both seen flat or declining shipments as 2008 has progressed.

All told, shipments data implies that electronics manufacturing is holding its own but not showing much growth.

What about unfilled orders as a forward indicator?

This information is not provided for semiconductors. It is, however, provided for the overall Computers and Electronic Products sector and also for the Computers & Related Products sub-sector and the Communications Equipment sub-sector. Yet it seems that the increase in unfilled orders in each of these categories is quite slim.

Interestingly, the SIA April Sales report indicates that semiconductor sales in the Americas increased only 1.3% over the March number. I would have expected to see a stronger correlation between sales (per the SIA report) and shipments (per the Durable Goods report). Instead, semiconductor sales according to SIA seem to be much more in the range of the Computers and Electronic Products shipments and unfilled orders numbers from the Durable Goods report.

Conclusion --

If it is true that semiconductor shipments are a leading indicator it appears that electronics manufacturers must have extremely positive outlooks for the second half of 2008.

Still, that 25% growth in semiconductor shipments seems to be the only number available that reflects that kind of bullishness. I am troubled that it is not confirmed by the SIA report.

Perhaps it is too early in the year for unfilled orders or the SIA sales numbers to reflect second half growth. On the other hand, perhaps that growth is going to prove elusive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be conservative with your 401K

Most of the posts I and other financial bloggers write are typically focused on individual stocks or ETFs and managing active portfolios. For those folks who are more conservative investors, those whose main investment vehicle is a 401K, for example, the techniques for portfolio management might be a little different. The news of stock markets falling and pundits predicting recession is disconcerting to professional investors as well as to those of us who are watching our balances in an IRA or 401K sag. What approach should the average 401K investor take? Let's assume that the investor is contributing on a regular basis to one of these retirement accounts. There are two questions that the investor needs to ask: 1. Should I stop putting the regular contribution into stocks? My feeling is that investors making regular contributions are being handed a present by the markets. Every week the market goes down, these investors are lowering their average cost. When markets reco...

The Trouble with Trend Reversal Indicators

Many of us use various trend reversal indicators to time our trades. Our desire is to determine when prices have changed direction so that we can ride the new trend. Why doesn't it always work out? The first reason, of course, is that unforeseen events often drive prices in unexpected directions. That is something we can't change and it often makes all of us technical traders crazy. On the other hand, sometimes an unforeseen event is a prelude to a new trend. A stock spikes up on a what seems to be a one-time piece of good fortune and soon falls back. Does it start making its way back up or does it resume a previous down trend? The conflict within trend reversal indicators is that, though they can definitely tell when prices change direction, they suffer from two problems. One, they often can't determine how significant that move in prices actually will be. Two, they are often lagging indicators. As such, they can be late in providing a signal, sometimes leading the investo...

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #4

This is the fourth article in a series of posts describing 10 tools to help you identify and evaluate good investing ideas. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. ( Click here to read the original post ) With this fourth post, we will continue another step along the path of finding stocks that seem to have some potential. The first post in the series discussed how to use unusual activity to identify investing ideas. The second post described how to use stock screeners. The third post described how to use lists of new highs and new lows. This post will focus on identifying social or business trends in order to find investing ideas. Information on new trends might turn up anywhere. In conversation with friends or business associates, in newspapers or magazines, on TV or though your work. The key is to be aware of trends and how they start, stop or change. We'll start by describing what...