Skip to main content

Nielson - new cop on the block

Back in July I wrote a post that investigated whether companies with the most patents ended up with the best stock performance. It turned out that the answer was "no" but in looking at some of the companies in our sample set, we came across Digimarc (DMRC). The company is in the news again today as Nielson announced a partnership with Digimarc to implement what amounts to a DRM system on Internet video.

An excerpt from the announcement Nielson made today follows:

"The Nielsen Company and Digimarc Corporation (NASDAQ: DMRC) today announced a new service - Nielsen Digital Media Manager - that will enable media companies, social networks, peer-to-peer services and user generated content sites to monitor and manage the distribution of media content across the Internet.

Nielsen Digital Media Manager will use digital watermarking and fingerprinting to establish an industry-wide rules-based solution to copyright security and to assure copyright compliance. By providing a more reliable way to track content, the service will help clients realize the value of their digital content, promote the expansion of Internet-distributed media and facilitate a number of revenue streams, including ad-pairing, e-commerce, royalty reporting and others."

(Click here to read the entire company news release)

It is no surprise to see Nielson attempt to wade into this contentious area. While restrictions have been in place on music files in the form Digital Rights Management or DRM for some time now, there hasn't been a corresponding industry-wide movement in the realm of Internet video. Nielson says it already encodes 95% of national television programming so it has a leg up on competitors. As Viacom sues YouTube, it can be said that there are definitely customers out there waiting for a service such as Nielson plans to offer. Expectations are that the system will be available in mid-2008.

Naturally, I have a few comments on these developments.

First, it appears that no one has learned from the experiences of the music industry. Consumers have developed tremendous antipathy to various DRM schemes interfering with usage of digital music content. One has only to look at the falling sales volume of (often DRM-protected) CDs to see that consumers are happier with soft copies (MP3s) and that they demand the right to share content they have legally purchased. It appears that the Nielsen Digital Media Manager will allow digital video content owners to hound consumers in much the same way that the RIAA has done to music consumers.

Second, Nielson makes a point of using several interesting phrases including "ad-pairing, e-commerce, royalty reporting." After the initial police-the-Internet approach runs into consumer resistance and backlash, the revenue-related aspects of Nielson's system may assume greater importance. And here is where Nielson may really have a significant concept to exploit. If Nielson can actually provide ad-relevancy to video, that would be a major step forward. As Google has proved, relevancy is one of the most important predictors of ad effectiveness. Simplification of copyright issues related to legal file streaming or file downloading would also be a benefit to the industry for both content creators and content distributors. Unfortunately, these aspects of the system will not be available initially.

What about Digimarc?

The result of all this should be positive for Digimarc. It raises their profile and provides needed revenue. Financial terms have not been disclosed, but Digimarc said the contract "is expected to significantly contribute" to the company's financial performance in 2008. This couldn't come at a better time. Digimarc CEO Bruce Davis just presided over an earnings announcement where he delivered the bad news that the company would not be profitable in 2007 and that 2008 could be a difficult year due to uncertainty around the government's Real ID identification program. If the Nielson Digital Media Management system runs into resistance it could be a tough year for Digimarc.

Disclosure: author owns no shares of DMRC


Anonymous said…
Digimarc 10-K 2008 - is Davis telling us everything?

I find it odd that Digimarc CEO Bruse Davis painted a rosy picture for FY08 while just two months back he dumped 20,000 of his own shares in the firm?

Is Bruce Davis providing stockholders the full picture and outlook for DMRC? No mention was made to the fact that in the last several weeks they have lost contracts in New Hampshire, Massachussetts, Virginia and are poised to lose the California DMV contract to their major competitor. What other states are we about to lose? Is this why the CEO is selling his own shares?

Digimarc has a major share in the US driver license business but it's shrinking and has been for quite a while. It seems to have accelerated now though? With a track record like that it's no wonder Davis is dumping his shares while he can. At $8 a share in the early part of 08 he'll get more than the $2 per that DMRC will be expecting to fetch by the same time next year (Q1 09).

How many contracts are we (DMRC) holding onto by means of procurment protest? Keeping our clients from awarding to our competitors can't make long term business sense?

Another question for Davis - Where are DMRC on the federal front? The major competitors are scoring long-term hundred million dollar contracts and we don't even see Digimarc in the hunt (L1 win WHTI Passport Card Award from DOS).

I don't think we get the whole story from Davis. It's time for him to go, but I think he'll beat us to firing him.

Popular posts from this blog

Brazil - in a bubble or on a roll?

A couple of years ago, no one recognized the real estate bubble even though it was under everyone's nose. Now, analysts and bloggers are seeing bubbles everywhere they look. One of them, they say is in Brazil whose Bovespa stock market index has doubled in the last 12 months. Does the bubble accusation hold water? I don't think so and here are 7 reasons why Brazil is by no means a bubble economy: Exports have held up over the past year thanks to demand from China for Brazil's soya exports and iron ore. This was helped by the the Brazilian government's drive to improve trade links with Asia and Africa. Export diversification, spurred by a more active trade policy and increased focus on "south-south" trade under current president Lula, helped mitigate the decline in demand from OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries A "sensible" economic framework has been in place since the 1990's. This has included inflation

Thursday Bounce: Trend Busters, Swing Signals and Trend Leaders for July 9, 2009

This is a quick post to announce that we have published Thursday's Trend Leaders, Swing Signals and Trend Busters at Alert HQ . All are based on daily data. Today we have the following: 72 Swing Signals -- A couple of days ago we had 35 signals, today we have twice as many. Happily, we now have 65 BUY signals, a mere 4 SELL Signals plus 3 Strong BUYs. Whoo-hoo! 56 Trend Leaders , all in strong up-trends according to Aroon, MACD and DMI. There are 18 new stocks that made today's list and 60 that fell off Tuesday's list. 48 Trend Busters of which 5 are BUY signals and 43 are SELL signals The view from Alert HQ -- Talk about mixed signals. If you look at our Swing Signals list you would think the market was in the middle of a big bounce. BUY signals are swamping the SELL signals and we even have a few Strong BUYs. Yes, there's a good sprinkling of tech stocks and tech ETFs but the distribution is pretty broad-based with a good number of different sectors represented, eve

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here: Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.