When the going gets tough in a particular industry, the companies involved go to the government. When competitiveness has been lost, the non-competitive want to dump their pension plans.
This means they march to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, known as the PBGC.
Back around 2002 it was the steel industry. The following companies went to the PBGC to unload their pension plan responsibilities: Bethlehem Steel (one of the biggest plans to be terminated), National Steel, Northwestern Steel and Wire, Weirton Steel, Kaiser Steel and more. Many of these companies declared bankruptcy and shut down plants. Whatever was still valuable was sold off or merged into the remaining bigger, stronger steel companies that were still standing.
More recently, the airlines pulled a similar move: United Airlines, TWA, Aloha Airlines and US Airways all terminated their plans and turned them over to the PBGC. The difference in this case is that some of the companies had no intention of closing their doors for good. They took the descent into bankruptcy as an opportunity to trim down, shed liabilities and come back to fight another day.
As the automakers go to Washington to beg for funding for mergers that may or may not make sense, it is only a matter of time before the most wounded among them begins to evaluate the strategy the steel companies and airlines followed: declare bankruptcy and terminate the pension plan, allowing it to be taken over by the PBGC. Emerge from bankruptcy without the onerous and expensive need to support the thousands of retirees that increase the cost of each car produced. Instantly be more competitive with the Japanese and South Korean car companies.
According to the Wall Street Journal, GM alone provides health care and pensions for 480,000 retirees. This will cost the company over $64 billion between 2009 and 2017. In 2005, pension costs were estimated to add $700 to the cost of each car produced with health care costs adding another $1500. With the horrific performance of the stock market this year, the pension fund is projected to be underfunded by as much as $18 billion by the end of 2008.
There are already plans for GM to move their health care responsibilities to a trust managed by the UAW. It will cost them billions of dollars to do so and still they will remain uncompetitive. If GM can't find an entity that supports the merger with Chrysler, look for the company to fly the same route that the airlines took: straight to the PBGC.
Disclosure: none
Monday, October 27, 2008
Could automakers take same route as airlines?
Blog Archive
-
►
2010
(153)
-
►
August
(15)
- With your ideas we can build a better Alert HQ tog...
- Total Return Ratio -- 11 stocks John Neff might ha...
- Intel cuts outlook -- confirms cautionary signal i...
- Stock Inspector Tips & Tricks -- fix bad "flash cr...
- June Durable Goods -- mixed signals from tech keep...
- Is company guidance worth listening to?
- Q2 earnings scorecard -- believe the guidance or b...
- Two reasonable value stocks raising dividends this...
- Analysts can't agree on outlook for semiconductors...
- Google keeps getting social - and stands to make m...
- A week without posting - here's what I've been up ...
- 15 under-valued stocks to buy on a pullback
- Does finding winning stocks have to be so hard?
- Three weeks of earnings -- it's clear which sector...
- Stocks take a rest -- will they wake up rejuvenate...
-
►
July
(16)
- June Durable Goods -- Tech sector at a tipping poi...
- Earnings finally matter -- and the market recovers...
- Agriculture sector is on fire -- here's a roundup ...
- Value stock with a growth stock chart -- RLI could...
- Earnings scorecard -- two weeks in, where's the ev...
- Stocks show gains two days in a row -- is the rall...
- Bond ETF reversal alert -- but will the rally cont...
- All it takes is one bad day and advantage goes to ...
- Weekly ProShares Review -- foreign stocks grab inv...
- An update to Trade-Radar Stock Inspector is availa...
- Heads up! -- 4 Reasonable Value stocks starting t...
- Market turns on a dime last week -- now, fundament...
- One bad month of data and the wheels come off -- c...
- 7 day losing streak for the Dow but not every stoc...
- 8 steps to simpler investing
- After being wrong for two weeks, am I finally seei...
-
►
June
(16)
- Not dead yet
- May Durable Goods -- Tech wavers but the trend is ...
- Humana tops our "reasonable value" list with some ...
- Weekly ProShares review -- bulls still at work but...
- Say what you will about the fundamentals -- this m...
- Value by Industry -- how do your favorite sectors ...
- Time to buy -- little known small cap could be Gul...
- Weekly ProShares review shows bulls in the ascenda...
- Dare I say it? --- the bottom is in (well, maybe)
- Stocks hold their gains for a whole day -- is it g...
- Warning signs for semiconductors?
- Slide show demonstrates ease of use of new Trade-R...
- Ride the momentum train -- this week's strongest P...
- Mr. Market trips over jobs report - bulls left hid...
- Weekend Winners and Losers for June 4, 2010
- Android - smartest thing Google has done lately?
-
►
August
(15)
-
▼
2008
(266)
-
▼
October
(22)
- A cold Christmas for on-line retailers?
- ProShares ETF Links - the list for Oct, 30, 2008
- Durable goods report reveals more tech weakness
- Could automakers take same route as airlines?
- Weekly Review - is the cup half full or half empty...
- Free Stock Alerts - Alert HQ for Oct 24, 2008
- Who will the leaders be when the next bull market ...
- From worried bear to cautious bull?
- Weekly Review - the slide slows as stocks rise
- Buffet says buy stocks, what should you do?
- Free Stock Alerts - Alert HQ for Oct 17, 2008
- 10 ways tech gets hurt by the consumer slowdown
- Garnter and Sun's Schwartz on different planets
- Lightening up on my ultra shorts
- Weekly Review - the beatings continue
- Free Stock Alerts - Alert HQ for Oct 10, 2008
- Ban on short sales set to end - what next?
- 401k keeping you awake at night? Me too...
- Citi: consumer down and out, economy, too
- Weekly Review - keep bailing, this market is sinki...
- Free Stock Alerts - Alert HQ for Oct 3, 2008
- 10 ways the financial meltdown impacts tech
-
▼
October
(22)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |



Subscribe to













1 comments:
I see the major problem of GM being rooted in their pursuance of SUV's via the tax breaks that were offered for SUV's up to 80k. Basically the big three couldn't compete in small cars because of the huge labor/pension cost per vehicle, but were okay whenever this cost was spread out over a larger vehicle. The underlying mistep hasn't been corrected with new products, but it also wouldn't be viable unless labor costs can be brought down. Basically it doesn't matter how good GM's small cars are because the margins will be wiped out by the higher labor costs.
Also, GM has gone with the Honda model of production, which is slightly slower to respond and higher in setup costs than the Toyota model. GM needs to get more fleet in manufacturing, more lean on pension load, and more focused on competition in smaller vehicles.
World oil production is only going to continue getting outpaced by growth in demand. This is going to produce more and more SUV-like contractions in spending on big cars and more spending on more economical transportation as time goes on. The general trend is set. I believe you're right that GM has no way to survive with its current UAW burden. GM is stuck between large vehicle market contraction and small vehicle low margins.
Post a Comment