Skip to main content

Q2 earnings scorecard -- believe the guidance or believe the bears?

The 2010 2nd quarter earnings season has wound down so it's a good time to do a comparison the 1st quarter.

I always say that earnings are ancient history so I focus on forward guidance. Unfortunately only 40% of companies provide guidance; nevertheless, I would contend 40% is enough to get a good picture of where the market might be heading.

The two charts below compare Q2 to Q1. The percentages displayed are based on the total number of stocks in a sector that provided guidance. This first chart, for example, looks at how many stocks offered upside guidance as a percentage of stocks in a sector that provided guidance.
Q2 vs Q1, Upside Guidance
This chart shows that Q2 is roughly the same as Q1: in both quarters 23% of guidance offered was to the upside. In other words, there has been no decrease in upside guidance quarter-over-quarter. For those pessimists looking for evidence of the double dip, I'm afraid there is no bearish confirmation in this measure.

Not shown are the charts for Mixed guidance and Inline guidance. They are almost exactly like the chart above in that there was very little change from Q1 to Q2.
Q2 vs Q1, Downside Guidance
There has been an increase in the amount of downside guidance in Q2 compared to Q1 but that increase is not that drastic. All told, in Q2, 12% of the companies offering guidance provided downside guidance compared to 9% in Q1. Once again the Financials take their place at the bottom of the barrel.They were noticeably bad in Q1 and even worse in Q2. If there's a double dip happening in looks like it's going to be in the Financial sector.

Conclusion --

Based on forward guidance provided by company management during the Q2 earnings season, it seems the economy is expected to continue to muddle along. The majority of companies are expecting mixed or inline results, nearly a quarter of companies are expecting improved results and only 12% are expecting results to worsen.

This may not be sufficient to guarantee an economic resurgence but it sure doesn't seem to confirm the most dire, double dip projections of the bears.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be conservative with your 401K

Most of the posts I and other financial bloggers write are typically focused on individual stocks or ETFs and managing active portfolios. For those folks who are more conservative investors, those whose main investment vehicle is a 401K, for example, the techniques for portfolio management might be a little different. The news of stock markets falling and pundits predicting recession is disconcerting to professional investors as well as to those of us who are watching our balances in an IRA or 401K sag. What approach should the average 401K investor take? Let's assume that the investor is contributing on a regular basis to one of these retirement accounts. There are two questions that the investor needs to ask: 1. Should I stop putting the regular contribution into stocks? My feeling is that investors making regular contributions are being handed a present by the markets. Every week the market goes down, these investors are lowering their average cost. When markets reco...
7 comments
Read more

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here:   https://tradingstockalerts.com/software/downloadpatch Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.
Post a Comment
Read more

Sprint - Why WiMAX?

I was somewhat surprised when I heard that Sprint Nextel ( S ) was building a separate network based on WiMAX technology. This is not a replacement for its 3G cell phone system but in addition to it. Why would they do such a thing given the scale, complexity and cost? Are they doing this in the hope that if they build it, they (customers) will come? So first of all, what is WiMAX and why is it significant? Technically speaking, it is a 4G wireless broadband network that uses the mobile WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) IEEE 802.16e-2005 technology standard. Why is that good? Because you can get high-speed Internet access with it for devices ranging from phones to PCs and devices we haven't thought of yet. And in this case, WiMAX "high-speed" is significantly faster than typical Internet access via current mobile phone technology. It will be a real data network, not a data pipe bolted onto a telecommunications network. What could this lead to in the f...
3 comments
Read more