Skip to main content

Yahoo and Google- get it over with!

I have written once before on how Yahoo was making some good moves in terms of phasing out unprofitable lines of business and increasing focus on core business functions.

Yesterday it was announced that Yahoo CEO Terry Semel had resigned and would be replaced with Yahoo founder Jerry Yang. Investors initially cheered this news but then concluded that Jerry Yang did not represent enough of a change. The stock ended today down 1.7%.

The bloggers and analysts are now speculating on potential directions for Yahoo. Mergers with or acquisitions by Time Warner, Microsoft and the other usual suspects have been mentioned.

My opinion is that Google should spend some of their billions and acquire Yahoo. The two companies are completely complementary. Google offers the dominant search and online advertising platforms on the web. Who needs Yahoo's Panama when you can sign up with Google?

Google realizes they need to augment their presence with more content; hence, the purchase of YouTube. Yahoo has tons of content. They are the most visited site on the web. Their financial, email, news, shopping, Flickr photosharing site and other features are far more popular than similar features offered by Google.

Why should these two companies compete head to head when a combination would create an Internet powerhouse? Come on, Google! Buy Yahoo and get it over with.
Labels:

Comments

mdmcginn said…
Maybe more people visit Yahoo than any other site. But that doesn't mean that everybody visits Yahoo. Visits there make up only a tiny fraction of all visits to websites, after all. It has lots of goodies, but until it has better search capabilities, I will continue to avoid it - mostly because it's cluttered with goodies. As a Standard & Poor's analyst put it, Yahoo has had stability. But stability is not enough.

-- Michael from the U.S. Desk at TheNewsRoom.com
June 20, 2007 at 1:33:00 AM EDT
TradeRadarOperator said…
Michael, I agree that Yahoo's search capabilities don't measure up to Google's. That's one of the reasons I believe a combination of the two companies would be compelling.
June 20, 2007 at 10:10:00 PM EDT

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trade Radar gets another update

Some of our data sources changed again and it impacted our ability to load fundamental/financial data. In response, we are rolling out a new version of the software: 7.1.24 The data sourcing issues are fixed and some dead links in the Chart menu were removed. So whether you are a registered user or someone engaged in the free trial, head over to our update page and download the latest version. The update page is here:   https://tradingstockalerts.com/software/downloadpatch Contact us if you have questions or identify any new issues.
Post a Comment
Read more

Unlock Stock Market Profits - Key #4

This is the fourth article in a series of posts describing 10 tools to help you identify and evaluate good investing ideas. It is based on a post that provides a summary of the ten keys that individual investors should use to identify profitable stock trades. ( Click here to read the original post ) With this fourth post, we will continue another step along the path of finding stocks that seem to have some potential. The first post in the series discussed how to use unusual activity to identify investing ideas. The second post described how to use stock screeners. The third post described how to use lists of new highs and new lows. This post will focus on identifying social or business trends in order to find investing ideas. Information on new trends might turn up anywhere. In conversation with friends or business associates, in newspapers or magazines, on TV or though your work. The key is to be aware of trends and how they start, stop or change. We'll start by describing what...
6 comments
Read more

Business Intelligence consolidation - who's next?

We have seen a consolidation wave begin in the Business Intelligence space. IBM just bought Cognos and Oracle recently bought Hyperion. SAP just announced they are buying Business Objects after barely having time to digest their recent acquisition of Pilot Software. There are three major database vendors at this time: IBM with their DB2 product, Oracle with their flagship Oracle database and Microsoft with their SQL Server database. IBM and Oracle now have premier, industrial-strength data analysis and reporting products in their product portfolios that complement their core database products. Microsoft has what, Excel? Actually, Microsoft, like IBM and Oracle, has a suite of proprietary tools that do happen to integrate very well with Excel and SQL Server. Still, IT departments are not deploying the Microsoft tools for heavy-duty corporate use. Microsoft is unique among the big three by their lack of a premier reporting product. It seems safe to assume that Microsoft will be the next...
1 comment
Read more