Intel announced their fourth quarter 2007 earnings after the close today. Here are the headline numbers:
2007 Operating Income $8.2 Billion, up 45 Percent
• Fourth-Quarter Revenue $10.7 Billion, up 10.5 Percent Year-over-Year
• Gross Margin 58 Percent, up 8.5 Points Year-over-Year
• Operating Income $3 Billion, up 105 Percent Year-over-Year
• Record Microprocessor and Chipset Units and Revenue
• Net Income $2.3 Billion; EPS 38 Cents
Sounds great. So why did the stock drop over 13% in after hours trading? Q1 is always seasonally weak but this year the company sees weakness somewhat beyond mere seasonality. Many investors are taking this as another sign of economic weakness, another bellwether stock throwing in the towel even as management contends that the company is still a growth story.
Below I have provided my quick notes from listening to the conference call. Take a look and you can decide whether Intel's guidance is a disaster or merely a modest slowdown while still in growth mode. I have captured phrases that seemed important but I have not provided precise quotes.
Highlights from the Business Overview
Margins improved from Q3
Server business had a great 4th quarter
Mobile unit growth continues to be very strong, records set in Q4. Lower price points consistent with consumer purchase capabilities; Intel will be able to supply products with reasonable margins to these price points as planned
Desktop processor shipments up 40% from Q3
All segments up yoy
Channel inventories healthy
NAND environment worse than anticipated, ASPs down
Flat ASP for microprocessors
yoy gross margins 8.5% better than 4Q06
The company continued to reduce spending as a percentage of revenue during Q4
Staffing is down 8% yoy
Sequential decline of 9% in revenue using mid-point of estimated ranges tho 10% increase yoy (my emphasis)
1Q08 margins improved over 4Q07 but lower processor unit sales are expected (my emphasis)
Highlights of the Q&A portion of the call
NAND environment hurt Q4, will hurt Q1. NOR also will be weak in Q1.
In CPU, inventory is lower than preferred but no unusual cancellations seen in Q4, things seem normal
Q4 very strong in Europe; so far in January no significant signs of slowdown in Europe or elsewhere.
What is keeping margins flat sequentially? unit shipments seasonally lower than expected in Q1 but lower costs and better product mix should be yielding better margins as year progresses.
Combination of small impacts for Q1 shortfall: macro situation, Marvell business reduction continuing as expected, NAND pricing, etc.
PC market outlook: expectation is for growth in low double digits.
No signs of double ordering
Shift toward mobility is a growth driver. Lower cost notebooks opens more markets. Servers showing no signs of diminishing.
Emerging markets: big part of revenue growth, hit record in Q4, expecting good year in China in 2008, especially with Olympics coming.
With respect to economic or tech slowdown in 2008 - Intel and its customers "just don't see it", the problem is focused on US markets but 75% of Intel revenue is not from the US. Still, Intel feels it is "prudent" to be "cautious". (my emphasis)
What products are coming:
• Low cost notebooks, more mobile devices, consumer devices
• more 45 nanometer products coming, 30 products already launched and shipping
• WiFi notebooks will be introduced
• new processor architecture will be introduced, code-named Halo
Conclusion
Intel is now under $20 per share in after hours trading. It has not been this low since the summer of 2006. Based on the conference call, do you think this is a company on the ropes? Management seems fairly confident that business is good yet they feel it is "prudent" to be "cautious" as they announce greater than normal seasonal weakness. Not exactly a ringing endorsement. Still, I don't think you can fault Intel management here; they don't exactly have a crystal ball. They are hostages to the macro environment and, though there are still signs of reasonable strength in the PC business, we could easily see weakness increase if the US enters a serious recession and emerging markets and Europe are affected.
Intel shares are down about 29% from their peak. This conference call will probably blast the tech sector again tomorrow. Still, this is a quality company, a clear leader in its sector and its stock has been marked down dramatically. After an initial period of volatility, a patient investor may want to start building a position in the stock as it vacillates in the teens.
Source: Intel Investor Relations - Earnings Results
Disclosure: author does not own any share of INTC
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Intel disappoints - tech will feel the pressure
Blog Archive
-
►
2010
(153)
-
►
August
(15)
- With your ideas we can build a better Alert HQ tog...
- Total Return Ratio -- 11 stocks John Neff might ha...
- Intel cuts outlook -- confirms cautionary signal i...
- Stock Inspector Tips & Tricks -- fix bad "flash cr...
- June Durable Goods -- mixed signals from tech keep...
- Is company guidance worth listening to?
- Q2 earnings scorecard -- believe the guidance or b...
- Two reasonable value stocks raising dividends this...
- Analysts can't agree on outlook for semiconductors...
- Google keeps getting social - and stands to make m...
- A week without posting - here's what I've been up ...
- 15 under-valued stocks to buy on a pullback
- Does finding winning stocks have to be so hard?
- Three weeks of earnings -- it's clear which sector...
- Stocks take a rest -- will they wake up rejuvenate...
-
►
July
(16)
- June Durable Goods -- Tech sector at a tipping poi...
- Earnings finally matter -- and the market recovers...
- Agriculture sector is on fire -- here's a roundup ...
- Value stock with a growth stock chart -- RLI could...
- Earnings scorecard -- two weeks in, where's the ev...
- Stocks show gains two days in a row -- is the rall...
- Bond ETF reversal alert -- but will the rally cont...
- All it takes is one bad day and advantage goes to ...
- Weekly ProShares Review -- foreign stocks grab inv...
- An update to Trade-Radar Stock Inspector is availa...
- Heads up! -- 4 Reasonable Value stocks starting t...
- Market turns on a dime last week -- now, fundament...
- One bad month of data and the wheels come off -- c...
- 7 day losing streak for the Dow but not every stoc...
- 8 steps to simpler investing
- After being wrong for two weeks, am I finally seei...
-
►
June
(16)
- Not dead yet
- May Durable Goods -- Tech wavers but the trend is ...
- Humana tops our "reasonable value" list with some ...
- Weekly ProShares review -- bulls still at work but...
- Say what you will about the fundamentals -- this m...
- Value by Industry -- how do your favorite sectors ...
- Time to buy -- little known small cap could be Gul...
- Weekly ProShares review shows bulls in the ascenda...
- Dare I say it? --- the bottom is in (well, maybe)
- Stocks hold their gains for a whole day -- is it g...
- Warning signs for semiconductors?
- Slide show demonstrates ease of use of new Trade-R...
- Ride the momentum train -- this week's strongest P...
- Mr. Market trips over jobs report - bulls left hid...
- Weekend Winners and Losers for June 4, 2010
- Android - smartest thing Google has done lately?
-
►
August
(15)
-
▼
2008
(266)
-
▼
January
(16)
- Shorting financials -- again
- Graham posts good numbers - Cautionary note sinks ...
- New TradeRadar market scan turns up some surprises...
- UYG - Time to nibble on a financial ETF
- Weekly Market Update - still waiting for an up wee...
- Time to be conservative with your 401K
- IBM beats -- but is it representative of entire te...
- FXI -- China ETF breaks down
- Intel disappoints - tech will feel the pressure
- Expectations for China
- Markets bounce -- is it for real?
- Weak demand for oil? Maybe not...
- Intel at support already - what's next?
- Weekly Market Update - bears in control, time to s...
- Fed minutes reveal dismal outlook on 2008
- Intel downgrade may set up buying opportunity but ...
-
▼
January
(16)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |



Subscribe to













0 comments:
Post a Comment