Citi (C) has spent the last five years pushing risk prevention and regulatory compliance deep into the corporate culture, right down to the lowest levels. Under the leadership of Chuck Prince, the lawyer picked to head one of the world's largest financial institutions, no process detail has been too small for Citi's internal auditors to obsess over.
It is therefore quite ironic to see Citi undone by the flagrant lack of risk management at the highest levels in their fixed income and investment bank segments. SIVs seem like an easy way to make money? Citi had to be the biggest player. Sub-prime mortgages kicking out high interest rates? Grab as many as you can. CDO's look like a good place to park some money? More is better.
Evaluate the risk in all of this? Why bother? The pressure is on to expand profits; after all, this is the "year of no excuses." And no one gets fat bonuses by being timid, right?
So with so much of the debt on Citi's books going from "mark-to-model" to "mark to who knows what?" the risk clouds that started to gather on Citi's horizon are sure to continue to swirl around the company for months to come. Add to that the weakening of the US economy and the attendant raising of loan loss reserves to cover bad credit card and consumer debt and Citi is clearly in for more pain.
To me this seems like a classic case of misplaced focus as Citi chose to sweat the small stuff while letting the big stuff get out of hand. Citi has been penny wise and pound foolish.
Disclosure: author owns shares of C in a retirement account
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Citi - penny wise, pound foolish
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(40)
-
►
July
(9)
- Range-bound in an ugly market
- Durable Goods for June -- tech keeps muddling alon...
- 7 Profitable Tech Stocks with 50-DMA turning Bulli...
- A fix for the Trade-Radar software is available no...
- Trade-Radar is back on the air
- Trade-Radar weekly data running late
- From the doghouse to under-the-radar market leader...
- 15 more value stocks breaking out
- Weekly Market Update -- where did all the bears go...
-
►
July
(9)
-
►
2010
(189)
-
►
December
(7)
- Is CSC on the verge of better things?
- IT spending to increase in 2011 -- how should you ...
- Intevac -- breakout in progress, more room to run?...
- We'd like to hear what you have to say!
- ETF Trending Report -- one sector to avoid, one se...
- How much longer for the semiconductor rally?
- Labor shortages in the most populous nation on ear...
-
►
December
(7)
-
▼
2007
(200)
-
▼
November
(20)
- Does the Durable Goods report cast a shadow over t...
- Citi takes the money and runs
- AGCO -- is there any upside left?
- Weekly Market Update and TradeRadar portfolio roun...
- Business Intelligence consolidation - who's next?...
- Lending tightest since 1990 - can the Fed make a d...
- What happened to China Automotive Systems?
- Chinese stocks weakening -- an ETF can help
- Using the TradeRadar software -- thoughts after on...
- Industrial Production trending down -- are stocks ...
- FASB Rule 157 still has teeth
- SIA Forecast strengthens case for SanDisk
- Goldman sparks rally in financials but FASB Rule 1...
- Weekly Market Update - tech joins financials in th...
- Citi - penny wise, pound foolish
- Overweight Tech No Longer
- Financials tank but UltraShort ETF is up nicely
- Facebook Ad Platform Announced - why I'm skeptical...
- What happened to Rogers Corp?
- Inventory Level Analysis -- more gains in store fo...
-
▼
November
(20)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |


Subscribe to













0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.