Today we heard about the "investment" in Citigroup by an entity controlled by the government of Abu Dhabi. Citi will receive a $7.5 billion cash injection by selling a stake in the firm to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, the sovereign wealth fund that acts as the investment arm of the Abu Dhabi government.
The Investment Authority will receive equity units that pay an 11 percent annual yield until they are converted into Citigroup common shares at a price of up to $37.24 a share between March 15, 2010, and Sept. 15, 2011.
I was reminded of a post I recently read at the Information Arbitrage blog. (Read the post here) It was titled "Looking Overseas for a U.S. Financial Sector Bail-Out: It'll Cost You."
The author, Roger Ehrenberg (who also quotes Thorold Barker, a writer for the Financial Times), points out that the sovereign funds have "lots of investable cash at a time when relative bargains might become available. And given the scarcity value of their liquidity and the rough shape of many U.S. financial firms, they will likely demand far more onerous terms than they've gotten previously."
At a coupon rate of 11 percent, Citi is paying junk bond prices for the cash it is receiving. These are indeed terms better than were offered previously. Ehrenberg and Barker seemed to have called the play quite accurately.
There have been a number of publications and blogs that have focused on that 11% rate, considering it expensive and an admission by Citi that they are in desperate shape. There has been one blogger who feels it is a good deal for Citi. Andrew Clavell has written on his blog, Financial Crookery, a post (read it here) that describes how Citi is actually receiving "funds for 4 years at a cost equivalent to another financing source of Libor+150." He refers to it as "smart business" on the part of Citi.
Be that as it may, it also seems to be smart business for the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority who will collect a nice premium to the current dividend.
Disclosure: author is long C
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Citi takes the money and runs
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(40)
-
►
July
(9)
- Range-bound in an ugly market
- Durable Goods for June -- tech keeps muddling alon...
- 7 Profitable Tech Stocks with 50-DMA turning Bulli...
- A fix for the Trade-Radar software is available no...
- Trade-Radar is back on the air
- Trade-Radar weekly data running late
- From the doghouse to under-the-radar market leader...
- 15 more value stocks breaking out
- Weekly Market Update -- where did all the bears go...
-
►
July
(9)
-
►
2010
(189)
-
►
December
(7)
- Is CSC on the verge of better things?
- IT spending to increase in 2011 -- how should you ...
- Intevac -- breakout in progress, more room to run?...
- We'd like to hear what you have to say!
- ETF Trending Report -- one sector to avoid, one se...
- How much longer for the semiconductor rally?
- Labor shortages in the most populous nation on ear...
-
►
December
(7)
-
▼
2007
(200)
-
▼
November
(20)
- Does the Durable Goods report cast a shadow over t...
- Citi takes the money and runs
- AGCO -- is there any upside left?
- Weekly Market Update and TradeRadar portfolio roun...
- Business Intelligence consolidation - who's next?...
- Lending tightest since 1990 - can the Fed make a d...
- What happened to China Automotive Systems?
- Chinese stocks weakening -- an ETF can help
- Using the TradeRadar software -- thoughts after on...
- Industrial Production trending down -- are stocks ...
- FASB Rule 157 still has teeth
- SIA Forecast strengthens case for SanDisk
- Goldman sparks rally in financials but FASB Rule 1...
- Weekly Market Update - tech joins financials in th...
- Citi - penny wise, pound foolish
- Overweight Tech No Longer
- Financials tank but UltraShort ETF is up nicely
- Facebook Ad Platform Announced - why I'm skeptical...
- What happened to Rogers Corp?
- Inventory Level Analysis -- more gains in store fo...
-
▼
November
(20)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |


Subscribe to













0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.