Today we heard about the "investment" in Citigroup by an entity controlled by the government of Abu Dhabi. Citi will receive a $7.5 billion cash injection by selling a stake in the firm to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, the sovereign wealth fund that acts as the investment arm of the Abu Dhabi government.
The Investment Authority will receive equity units that pay an 11 percent annual yield until they are converted into Citigroup common shares at a price of up to $37.24 a share between March 15, 2010, and Sept. 15, 2011.
I was reminded of a post I recently read at the Information Arbitrage blog. (Read the post here) It was titled "Looking Overseas for a U.S. Financial Sector Bail-Out: It'll Cost You."
The author, Roger Ehrenberg (who also quotes Thorold Barker, a writer for the Financial Times), points out that the sovereign funds have "lots of investable cash at a time when relative bargains might become available. And given the scarcity value of their liquidity and the rough shape of many U.S. financial firms, they will likely demand far more onerous terms than they've gotten previously."
At a coupon rate of 11 percent, Citi is paying junk bond prices for the cash it is receiving. These are indeed terms better than were offered previously. Ehrenberg and Barker seemed to have called the play quite accurately.
There have been a number of publications and blogs that have focused on that 11% rate, considering it expensive and an admission by Citi that they are in desperate shape. There has been one blogger who feels it is a good deal for Citi. Andrew Clavell has written on his blog, Financial Crookery, a post (read it here) that describes how Citi is actually receiving "funds for 4 years at a cost equivalent to another financing source of Libor+150." He refers to it as "smart business" on the part of Citi.
Be that as it may, it also seems to be smart business for the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority who will collect a nice premium to the current dividend.
Disclosure: author is long C
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Citi takes the money and runs
Subscribe to:
RSS Feed (FeedBurner)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(138)
-
▼
July
(18)
- Traders might like this market; investors, not so ...
- Alert HQ for the week ending 7-18-2008
- Does change in ProShares BUY signals indicate sect...
- More trouble in store for OmniVision?
- Why is large cap value underperforming?
- Part 2 - Time to get conservative with your 401K
- The market hesitates - too soon to call the botto...
- Alert HQ for the week ending 7-11-2008
- ProShares Financial ETFs versus Real Estate ETFs -...
- Options or ETFs - which is better for the individu...
- Solar wafer prices on the rise again?
- ProShares ETFs fail to track NASDAQ properly today...
- Should the NASDAQ be considered a tech index?
- Short week but no less painful for investors
- Alert HQ for the week ending 7-3-2008
- Investors bet against decoupling
- Even banks like the ProShares Ultra-Short Financia...
- Stock market technical outlook - some measures wor...
-
►
June
(21)
- Alert HQ for the week ending 6-27-2008
- ProShares ETFs - why trading volume makes a diffe...
- Two ProShares inverse ETFs not yet overbought
- The Trouble with Trend Reversal Indicators, Part 2...
- Can the Saudis keep us from testing the March lows...
- ProShares ETF Report - Strongest BUY and SELL Sign...
- Alert HQ for the week ending 6-20-2008
- NII Holdings - still plenty of opportunity
- Industrial Production - tech propping up the numbe...
- S&P 500 Weekly Sector Stats, 6-13-2008
- Can stocks extend Friday's party?
- Alert HQ for the week ending 6-13-2008
- Big gap in social networking site audience
- Ocwen Financial - making the best of hard times
- S&P 500 - defensive sectors and energy lead
- Oil jumps while the stock market slides down the d...
- Alert HQ for the week ending June 6, 2008
- TradeRadar portfolio - June review
- Are semiconductor shipments a leading indicator of...
- S&P 500 - sector analysis shows more room for gain...
- Alert HQ - bonus BUY signals this week!
-
►
May
(20)
- Markets rebound - is the danger of new lows over?
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 30, 2008
- Using the new TradeRadar software - a more complet...
- Stocks drop - are we in a trading range or in free...
- TradeRadar software - Online version discontinued
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 23, 2008
- TradeRadar software version 3.0 - Bug Report
- Chip makers and semi equipment manufacturers on di...
- Can AOL stop dragging Time Warner down?
- Stocks show broad strength - is a breakout in stor...
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 16, 2008
-
▼
July
(18)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |
Subscribe to





Try the TradeRadar 


0 comments:
Post a Comment