After its much-discussed and over-subscribed IPO, VMWare (VMW) remains a subject of attention. Even when the topic is not VMWare, they become part of the story. Some of the items I have seen floating around the blogosphere include the following:
Citrix (CTXS) recently announced that they were acquiring XenSource, an open source server and desktop virtualization vendor. As one of the only competitors to VMWare that actually has viable products and customers, VMWare became part of the story.
In discussions of Microsoft's effort to develop and release their virtualization solution, it has been pointed out that Microsoft (MSFT) is devoting significant R&D funding but has not yet released the software and is said to be behind schedule. An interesting side note is that Microsoft and XenSource inked an agreement last year in which they would work together to ensure that Linux and XenSource software will operate with the Microsoft Veridian "hypervisor" virtualization engine. This is similar to an agreement Citrix signed with Microsoft years ago. What a tangled web is developing here.
There have also been some discussions of how server virtualization differs from desktop virtualization and how the expected increase in desktop virtualization may not favor VMWare. It's true, there is a difference, but both VMWare and XenSource offer solutions for the two alternatives. And Citrix, itself, offers a different flavor with its Presentation Server which offers a virtualized display off a central server. There are a couple of other players in this space but they are smaller and may not have the heft to compete with VMWare and Citrix in large scale data centers.
Some have made much of XenSource being an open source vendor that supports Linux as well as Windows. VMWare is not open source but they also support Linux and Windows, as well as Solaris and NetWare. As discussed above, Microsoft is making sure they can handle both Linux and Windows, too.
Finally, the newest VMWare killer is Pano Logic. This is a small start-up that has developed a device that replaces the PC entirely in a desktop virtualization scenario. The device allows all the functionality of a PC to be implemented on a server with only the keyboard, display and the Pano device actually residing on the users desk. Interistnly, the company's chief executive formerly worked at XenSource.
The bottom line after all this discussion is that, for now, VMWare is still by far the front-runner in the virtualization space. We know that Microsoft will be a formidable contender when they release their product. The only real change in the situation is that XenSource now has the deeper pockets of Citrix available to obtain more R&D funding. This should help XenSource become more competitive on a quicker timetable. And it may mean that Citrix will look to become the one-stop shop for all types of virtualization and application access and delivery solutions. This could make for an interesting alternative to VMWare. Large corporations, the kind most likely to adopt virtualization, will be very careful about adopting an approach as radical as Pano Logic's but it is worth keeping an eye on. As these solutions become more common, we will see the virtualization companies begin to compete on price. And here is where we may see VMWare's weakness emerge.
The only remaining question is whether VMWare merits a stock price over $70 per share. For now we'll let others argue about that one.
Disclosure: author does not own shares in any stocks mentioned in this article.
Monday, August 27, 2007
VMWare - still the center of attention
Subscribe to:
RSS Feed (FeedBurner)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(138)
-
▼
July
(18)
- Traders might like this market; investors, not so ...
- Alert HQ for the week ending 7-18-2008
- Does change in ProShares BUY signals indicate sect...
- More trouble in store for OmniVision?
- Why is large cap value underperforming?
- Part 2 - Time to get conservative with your 401K
- The market hesitates - too soon to call the botto...
- Alert HQ for the week ending 7-11-2008
- ProShares Financial ETFs versus Real Estate ETFs -...
- Options or ETFs - which is better for the individu...
- Solar wafer prices on the rise again?
- ProShares ETFs fail to track NASDAQ properly today...
- Should the NASDAQ be considered a tech index?
- Short week but no less painful for investors
- Alert HQ for the week ending 7-3-2008
- Investors bet against decoupling
- Even banks like the ProShares Ultra-Short Financia...
- Stock market technical outlook - some measures wor...
-
►
June
(21)
- Alert HQ for the week ending 6-27-2008
- ProShares ETFs - why trading volume makes a diffe...
- Two ProShares inverse ETFs not yet overbought
- The Trouble with Trend Reversal Indicators, Part 2...
- Can the Saudis keep us from testing the March lows...
- ProShares ETF Report - Strongest BUY and SELL Sign...
- Alert HQ for the week ending 6-20-2008
- NII Holdings - still plenty of opportunity
- Industrial Production - tech propping up the numbe...
- S&P 500 Weekly Sector Stats, 6-13-2008
- Can stocks extend Friday's party?
- Alert HQ for the week ending 6-13-2008
- Big gap in social networking site audience
- Ocwen Financial - making the best of hard times
- S&P 500 - defensive sectors and energy lead
- Oil jumps while the stock market slides down the d...
- Alert HQ for the week ending June 6, 2008
- TradeRadar portfolio - June review
- Are semiconductor shipments a leading indicator of...
- S&P 500 - sector analysis shows more room for gain...
- Alert HQ - bonus BUY signals this week!
-
►
May
(20)
- Markets rebound - is the danger of new lows over?
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 30, 2008
- Using the new TradeRadar software - a more complet...
- Stocks drop - are we in a trading range or in free...
- TradeRadar software - Online version discontinued
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 23, 2008
- TradeRadar software version 3.0 - Bug Report
- Chip makers and semi equipment manufacturers on di...
- Can AOL stop dragging Time Warner down?
- Stocks show broad strength - is a breakout in stor...
- Alert HQ for the week ending May 16, 2008
-
▼
July
(18)
| Disclaimer: This site may include market analysis. All ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, and/or speculate in the markets. Any investments, trades, and/or speculations made in light of the ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts, expressed or implied herein, are committed at your own risk, financial or otherwise. |
Subscribe to





Try the TradeRadar 


0 comments:
Post a Comment